2. Progress in concepts, definitions and measurement of the space economy
This chapter of the Handbook outlines key concepts and defines the space economy and other key terms used to describe and measure activities in the space economy. It also identifies different space products and services in national and international statistical frameworks to facilitate measurement.
Space applications are increasingly pervasive in many daily activities and there are a growing number of commercial activities taking place in orbit.
A decade ago, the OECD Space Forum conducted a series of expert workshops and broad consultations with diverse administrations, industry associations and small and large private sector stakeholders, in order to develop a concept of the space economy that captured the full range of space activities. Using lessons learnt from other sectors, notably the digital economy, a definition of the space economy was developed with the aim to encompass the different dimensions of programmes, services, and actors. The following working definition formed the starting point for the first Handbook on Measuring the Space Economy published in 2012 (OECD, 2012[1]).
The space economy is the full range of activities and the use of resources that create and provide value and benefits to human beings in the course of exploring, understanding, managing and utilising space.
Hence, it includes all public and private actors involved in developing, providing and using space-related products and services, ranging from research and development, the manufacture and use of space infrastructure (ground stations, launch vehicles and satellites) to space-enabled applications (navigation equipment, satellite phones, meteorological services, etc.) and the scientific knowledge generated by such activities. It follows that the space economy goes well beyond the space sector itself, since it also comprises the increasingly pervasive and continually changing impacts (both quantitative and qualitative) of space-derived products, services and knowledge on economy and society (OECD, 2012[1]).
Ever since, this OECD definition has been used extensively by the space community and public bodies, albeit with differing interpretations of which activities to include in specific segments.
Over the years, one prominent issue in measurement has concerned the inclusion of many new, mainly digital, goods and services that use products and technologies developed in the space sector as an intermediate input. An important trigger for this discussion was the growing use of embedded satellite signals (through Global Positioning System based products, for example) and data (e.g. through commercial geographic information systems) in different mass-market products and services (navigation apps in mobile devices, game apps in smartphones etc.). Direct-to-home satellite broadcasting is another example as major media players offer bundled services with cable, fibre and satellite solutions (see Box 2.1).
Two key recurring questions are:
Should the scope of the space economy be limited to activities generating products and technologies intended to fulfil the functions of a space programme or in support of a space activity?
Alternatively, should the definition also include industries producing digital products and services that are quite remote from traditional space activities, but which clearly rely on space capacities (satellite signals and data) to exist? In other words, should all the activities that use space services as an intermediate good be included in measurements of the space economy?
Within this context, the OECD Secretariat launched a new consultation process concerning the evolving definitions of the space sector and its derived activities. The consultation process involved more than 100 organisations from national administrations, business enterprises and industry associations. In parallel, several countries and agencies have also focused on what should be considered the space economy in their own definitions.
In 2020, the US Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) formulated the following definition when compiling their Space Economy Satellite Account (see the next sections for more on satellite accounts):
“The space economy consists of space-related goods and services, both public and private. This includes goods and services that:
are used in space, or directly support those used in space
require direct input from space to function, or directly support those that do
are associated with studying space” (Highfill, Jouard and Franks, 2020[2]).
This definition enables the categorisation and identification of selected products and services that are part of the space economy. It opens up new questions for some products (e.g. there was debate with the US space industry on whether or not to include ground-based solar panels that require a space input for energy generation, i.e. the sunlight). But overall, it covers well a whole of range of space products and services.
Based on all these recent developments and the extensive international consultation process (see Chapter 1 for a recap), there was a broad consensus in favour of standardising the overarching concept of the “space economy” in order to promote a common understanding and a common vocabulary when distinguishing between different space activities. Therefore, the Handbook recommends taking a comprehensive approach to measurement.
The end-result of this analysis is a set of general concepts and definitions that should help stakeholders get a better sense of which activities and actors to include in their analysis of space activities including:
The following sections identify the main sectors of application of space activities and the three segments of the space economy for measurement purposes. They feature activities that may be more or less challenging to measure.
Main sectors of space applications
The different uses or applications of space activities evolve constantly as space technologies become increasingly embedded in systems and services used in routine activities. Using well-recognised definitions and experiences from different countries surveying their space economy, the most common space activities are the following:
Satellite communications: The development and/or use of satellites and related subsystems to send signals to Earth for the purpose of fixed or mobile telecommunications services (voice, data, Internet, and multimedia) and broadcasting (TV and radio services, video services, Internet content).
Positioning, navigation and timing: The development and/or use of satellites and related subsystems for localisation, positioning and timing services. Navigation is used for air, maritime and land transport, or the localisation of individuals and vehicles. It also provides a universal referential time and location standard for a number of systems.
Earth observation: The development and/or use of satellites and related subsystems to measure and monitor Earth, including its climate, environment and people.
Space transportation: The development and/or use of launch vehicles and related subsystems. This includes launch services, government and commercial spaceports, space adventure rides, as well as “last mile” and logistics services for transportation between orbits, etc.
Space exploration: The development and/or use of crewed and uncrewed spacecraft (including space stations, rovers and probes) to explore the universe beyond Earth's atmosphere (e.g. the Moon, other planets, asteroids). Included in this sector are the International Space Station and astronaut-related activities.
Science: The category includes a range of scientific activities including space science, i.e. the various scientific fields that relate to space flight or any phenomena occurring in space or on other planets (e.g. astrophysics, planetary science, space-related life science, space debris tracking); and space-related earth science, i.e. the various science fields that use space-based observations to study the physical and chemical constitution of the Earth and its atmosphere (e.g. atmospheric science, climate research).
Space technologies: The category may include specific space system technologies that are used in various space missions, such as space nuclear systems (power, propulsion), solar electric propulsion, etc.
Generic technologies or components that may enable space capabilities: Some of these are not initially destined for use on a specific space system or for a specific space application but may then lead to new products and services (e.g. artificial intelligence and data analytics software). This could be the case for early-phase research, small off-the-shelf components used in various systems, or services based on integrated applications.
These are the main activities to focus on at this stage. Some organisations list “defence” as a separate application in order to distinguish between civil and military space activities. This Handbook does not make this distinction at the applications level but suggests the tracking of different types of procurers of space products and services including defence organisations (see Chapter 4 on surveys).
The three main segments of the space economy
The space economy concept is built upon decades of space operations via national space programmes and commercial activities and aims to improve international comparability across countries. It covers the main space activities listed in the previous section and divides the space economy loosely into three segments as shown in Figure 2.1. Using these general segments should allow for better international comparisons while also corresponding with existing data in many countries. The three segments are:
The upstream segment representing the scientific and technological foundations of space programmes (e.g. science, R&D, manufacturing and launch): This segment is relatively easy to measure with official and industry statistics.
The downstream segment (space infrastructure operations and “down-to-earth” products and services that directly rely on satellite data and signals to operate and function): Some, but not all, of the activities in this segment are easy to measure with official and industry statistics.
Activities that are derived/induced from space activities but are not dependent on it to function (e.g. technology transfers from the space sector to the automotive or medical sectors): This segment is not easily or readily measurable and necessitates extra steps for measurement (more in Chapter 5). The advantage of mentioning and considering it, is that it could lead to a better understanding of the pervasiveness of a growing number of space activities in the broader economy.
An increasing number of organisations are starting to use the “mid-stream” concept (between upstream and downstream) to categorise space and ground system operations and describe activities along the value chain (Australian Space Agency, 2021[3]). These crucial activities constitute the link between satellites and terrestrial infrastructures. They may be categorised in either upstream or downstream activities depending on methodological choices. Here, the Handbook recommends these activities be part of the downstream segment (see the section on Downstream space activities).
Upstream space activities
Any space programme requires strong scientific and technological foundations ranging from basic research to full production of space and ground systems. These activities are considered the upstream segment and include the following categories:
fundamental and applied research activities conducted at higher education institutions, public research organisations, and private and non-profit research organisations
ancillary services such as finance, insurance and legal services and consultancies
scientific and engineering support including the provision of research and development services, engineering services such as design and testing and similar activities
supply of materials and components for space and ground systems, including both passive parts (cables, connectors, relays, etc.) and active parts (e.g. diodes, transistors, semiconductors)
design and manufacture of space equipment and subsystems such as electronic and mechanic equipment and software for space and ground systems, as well as systems for spacecraft guidance, propulsion, power, communications, etc.
integration and supply of full systems including complete satellites/orbital systems and launch vehicles as well as terrestrial systems such as control centres and telemetry, tracking and command stations.
These activities are conducted by the government sector, space business enterprises and the scientific community at large and they are essential enablers for downstream activities. Historically, upstream space activities have been the focus of space economy statistics put together by governments and industry associations. Recent and future space activities could also be included here, e.g. space tourism, on-orbit servicing, active debris removal, on-orbit manufacturing and resource extraction.
Table 2.1 below showcases selected upstream activities and the organisations involved in the segment.
Downstream space activities
Downstream space activities comprise the provision of products and services that rely on satellite signals or data, aimed at consumer and business markets. They include primarily satellite communications and precision, navigation and timing applications, but also earth observation products and services, which have greatly benefited from advances in artificial intelligence and cloud computing. As the range and diversity of commercial space applications have grown in the past five years, space downstream activities have attracted much attention, including from private investors. Downstream activities include:
Space and ground systems operations: Satellite operations provide lease or sale of satellite capacity mainly for communications but also increasingly for earth observation. Ground systems constitute the link between satellites and terrestrial infrastructures with networks of ground stations at strategic positions (often polar or mid-latitude). Satellite operations firms may be active across the entire value chain, own their own satellites and ground stations for instance, and also provide products and services directly to customers.
Data distribution services: A growing number of companies provide cloud computing powered platforms or services simplifying the access, use and distribution of (mainly geospatial (GIS)) products.
Supply of devices and equipment supporting the consumer markets: Activities in this category include devices manufacturing (chipsets, terminals, global navigation satellite services (GNSS) equipment and other devices) and the development of software.
Supply of services supporting the consumer markets: Direct-to-home (DTH) provision (television, radio, broadband – see Box 2.1); positioning, navigation and timing services provision; provision of electro-optical imagery (telemetry, tracking and command services). Current applications include cartography and mapping; logistics and distribution; sales and marketing; surveillance and security; timing and precision work; and communications.
Supply of data added-value services: The processing of products and services from one or multiple data sources (satellite imagery/signals and in-situ observations, other sources of information) and transforming them into readily usable information. The same company may provide both raw and processed products and services. Many actors in this category do not consider themselves as space sector companies although their products depend on space signals or data.
The measurement challenge is particularly important for this segment of the space economy as the actual space-specific activities may be difficult to identify and may be easily over- or underestimated. An overview of selected downstream activities and organisations is presented in Table 2.2.
Direct-to-home (DTH) satellite services such as satellite television represent an important commercial activity in both OECD member countries and partner economies. Converging information technologies are increasingly combining different infrastructures to provide content to final consumers. The broadcasting operators are often large groups with many telecommunication and media activities.
Should the satellite broadcasting activities of these large media groups, typically unrelated to the space industry, be included as downstream activities of the space economy?
As compared to many other downstream space activities, demonstrating the link and reliance of these products and services on a space capacity is actually quite straightforward. Satellite television uses satellite links, although convergent technologies blur some of the packaging options (i.e. cable and fibre). Programming transmission, technology and fixed networks are recurring costs for satellite television broadcasters. As distributors of media information, most have long-term contractual commitments such as expenditures planned for several years in television rights. They also lease satellite transponder capacity. The DTH broadcasters contract out the commercial satellite operations for digital transmissions to their retail subscribers and free-to-air broadcast services.
By analysing the annual accounts of these large telecommunications groups, a formal link to a space activity may be documented transponder agreements such as operating leases and specific transponder prepayments. Although estimates can be made, it is more challenging to determine the share of revenues that are directly derived from the use of satellites. A number of consulting firms that serve telecommunication satellite operators and manufacturers provide regular market studies on existing and planned satellite transponders’ usage and the market prices involved. Such studies provide a first indication of the share of revenues derived from space activities. To refine data on broadcasters, one avenue is to examine annual reports where some details are publicly available. If such details are not publicly available, dedicated surveys of DTH satellite service providers may be necessary.
Although DTH activities represent a strong case-study in how satellites benefit consumer markets, the significance of these commercial satellite broadcasting activities should not be overestimated (i.e. these activities still represent overall very small percentages of the multi-billion revenues generated by the large media and telecommunication groups). However, when relevant, the value associated with commercial satellite use should be clearly identified and included in estimates of the space economy’s downstream activities.
Other space-derived activities
The third and last segment consists of broad economic activities that were developed at least partially thanks to the use of space technologies. This segment is quite distinct from the upstream space sector, as it usually involves users who may have benefited from space technology transfers to create their own new products (Olivari, Jolly and Undseth, 2021[4]). These outcomes can be measured by specific surveys and impact assessment studies (see Chapter 5).
The automotive and medical sectors, for instance, are home to many derived products that originally benefited from initial investments in the upstream space segment. Different monitoring techniques may be applied to keeping track of these particular indirect outcomes of space research and development (some of which are also outlined in Chapter 5).
Defining a “space company” has been a challenge for a long time. Very often business enterprises involved in the manufacturing of space products and/or in the provision of space-related services are also involved in other areas of the economy. They may derive only a part of their revenues from space activities. In other words, most business enterprises that produce upstream products and services for the space economy also produce goods and services beyond the space economy. As an illustration, it is not possible to count the total revenues of large aerospace manufacturers or media groups, as being entirely part of the space economy. To avoid overestimation, a major point is to check whether a space product or data is an integral part of the final service sold, and if so, to determine the value of the space item in the final output of the company.
In its 2013 study of almost 4 000 organisations in the US space sector, the US Department of Commerce found that some 71% of respondents were serving more than one market segment including aircraft, electronics, energy, missiles, ground vehicles, ships etc. (US Department of Commerce, 2013[5]). The rapid digitalisation of the downstream sector poses even greater challenges for the delineation between the space and non-space economies.
Much attention has been given to “new space” actors in recent years. New space actors include, generally speaking, upstream and downstream start-ups and new entrants from other areas (information and communications technologies firms including those engaged in data analytics in particular). The bulk of these new entrants may be identified through information on the recipients of government grants and services, participants in (government)-organised challenges, winners of prizes and different types of start-up support (incubators, accelerators, etc.), and following the investments of venture capital. As an illustration, SpaceX was the fourth largest NASA contractor in 2020 (by procurement awards), after Boeing, Lockheed Martin and Jacobs Technology, a technical professional services firm (NASA, 2021[6]).
Statistical classification systems provide definitions of the categories of economic activities and other related concepts used in economic statistics. Because of the relatively small size of the space economy, as well as the highly dispersed and varied nature of space activities, the production of space-related products and services (or commodities) tend to be spread across a wide number of economic activities. This makes it challenging to identify and distinguish space activities, products and services in statistics that rely upon existing classifications. However, official statistics based on existing statistical classification systems may still be used to form a baseline and allow comparisons across the economy as shown in the next sections.
International statistical classifications and their role in categorising the space economy
Many studies of the space economy use existing statistical classification systems and relevant codes for economic activities as the starting point of their analysis. Examples of classifications include the United Nations’ International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (currently ISIC Revision 4), the Statistical Classification of Economic Activities in the European Community (NACE Rev. 2.1), and the International Standard Classification of Occupations (ISCO-88). These are carefully coordinated with the System of National Accounts (SNA), which is the standard framework for economic accounting in OECD member countries. An overview of the links between international classifications recommended in the European System of National Accounts can be seen in Figure 2.2.
Source: Eurostat (2008[7]), “NACE Rev. 2: Statistical classification of economic activities in the European Community”, http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3859598/5902521/KS-RA-07-015-EN.PDF.
ISIC consists of a coherent and consistent classification structure of economic activities based on a set of internationally agreed concepts, definitions, principles and classification rules. The categories of economic activity are subdivided in a hierarchical, four-level structure of mutually exclusive categories. None of these categories is fully concordant with space activities even at the most detailed level. ISIC categories that include activities considered part of both the upstream and downstream segments of the space economy include aerospace, electronics, telecommunications and even armaments since rockets are counted as weapons in many countries (e.g. missile technology). Table 2.3 contains ISIC codes for categories of economic activity that partially include space activity for high-level international comparisons.
Since the publication of the first OECD Handbook on Measuring the Space Economy, an updated ISIC classification has been agreed upon. The current edition of ISIC (Rev. 4) (UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs, 2008[8]) includes a new category on satellite communications. The class 6130 “Satellite telecommunications activities” comprises three space-related components:
the use of a satellite telecommunications infrastructure for operating, maintaining or providing access to facilities for the transmission of voice, data, text, sound and video
the use of direct-to-home satellite systems for the delivery of visual, aural or textual programming received from cable networks, local television stations or radio networks to consumers (it is detailed in the class 6130 description that the units classified here do not generally originate programming material themselves)
the provision of Internet access by the operator of the satellite infrastructure.
ISIC Rev. 4 is considered a reference classification for most regional and national classification systems and it enables international comparisons between statistics categorised accordingly. The Statistical Classification of Economic Activities in the European Community (NACE) mostly corresponds with ISIC Rev.4 and includes more detailed categories suitable for European users of the classification at lower levels. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) also partially relates to ISIC Rev.4 and is almost entirely concordant up to the two-digit level of detail. There is also concordance with the Australian and New Zealand Standard Industrial Classification (ANZSIC) and other regional and national classifications.
Findings from industry surveys and studies indicate that the bulk of space activity tends to be measured under ISIC Rev.4 Section I: Information and communications (covering satellite communications) and Section C: Manufacturing (covering space manufacturing) (see Chapter 4 on industry surveys).
As of early 2022, new revision processes are underway for almost all classification systems to take into account the growing digitalisation of the economy in official statistics (i.e. ISIC, NACE, NAICS and also CPC classifications).
The issue of aggregated categories can be found also in other international classifications such as the United Nation’s Central Product Classification Version 2.1 (CPC Ver.2.1) and the 2017 Harmonized Commodity Description and Coding System (HS 2017) of the World Customs Organization. Table 2.4 provides the equivalences between the main classification systems.
A challenge to the use of official statistics in the measurement of the space economy is that space activities and products are not always found in the statistical classification systems used by national statistical offices. The space economy is therefore not readily visible in most of the official statistics produced. This can, however, be circumvented through additional statistical analysis.
Some national and regional classification systems provide more space-related detail than the international classifications. NAICS, for example, categorises the manufacture of space vehicles and launchers and satellite communications, but most downstream activities, such as earth observation, remain unidentified.
Below is a non-exhaustive list of four-digit ISIC codes that contain space activities together with the equivalent regional codes for North America (NAICS) and Europe (NACE). At four-digit levels, activities tend to be grouped together when they share a common process for producing products or services using similar technologies.
Most notable is ISIC code 6130: “Satellite telecommunications activities”, which is the only ISIC four-digit code that is fully space-related.
The other codes include 3030: “Manufacture of air and spacecraft and related machinery”, 6020: “Television programming and broadcasting activities” and finally, 2651: “Manufacture of measuring, testing, navigating and control equipment”, which covers the manufacture of chipsets and devices for global navigation satellite systems, and which accounts for a significant share of recent growth recorded in space economy estimates.
With the exception of ISIC 2651, these codes tend to represent activities producing goods and services used in final demand (i.e. the list does not include products and services consumed as inputs in the production of others, so called intermediate consumption) (United Nations Statistical Commission, 2009[9]).
In some cases, national/regional classifications provide more detailed categories for certain space activities. For example, NACE 51.22: “Space transport” provides more detail than ISIC 5120: “Freight transport”, while NAICS 336414: “Guided missile and space vehicle manufacturing” provides more detail than ISIC 3030: “Manufacture of air and spacecraft and related machinery”.
Despite their lack of space-related detail, existing statistical classification systems remain an important starting point for economic analysis of the space economy and for targeted surveys of organisations operating in the space economy. Many companies developing downstream space applications are for instance registered as data-processing companies under the ISIC four-digit code 6311: “Data processing, hosting and related activities”. In turn, targeted surveys can be used to collect basic information on the share of space activities in total activities of individual organisations, which subsequently can be linked to microdata that are already available in statistical offices for the production of official statistics. This provides the opportunity to generate statistics at more aggregated levels. This method has recently been applied in a study on the space economy in the Netherlands (Dialogic, 2020[10]).
A step further: Building a “satellite account” for space activity
The previous sections have shown that space activities are not readily visible in official statistics. Once the relevant categories that contain space activity in official statistics have been identified, the share of each of these activities and products that is attributable to the space economy can be estimated. This is where the national accounts framework can assist.
The system of national accounts aims to measure every economic activity, even if the fine details may not be readily visible. The relationship between activities and products is made explicit through “supply and use” tables (SUTs). SUTs are produced by national statistical offices and offer a comprehensive picture of the inner workings of a national economy. SUTs record how the supply of different kinds of products and services originate from domestic industries and imports and how the use of these products and services is split between various intermediate or final uses (including exports).
The most comprehensive way to benefit from the national accounting system is through the development of a “satellite account” for space economic activities. Satellite accounts are linked to the core national accounts but provide a more detailed description of a specific economic function or theme (e.g. environment, tourism, health, ocean economy, transport) (van de Ven, 2021[11]). Their link to the traditional system of national accounts makes it possible to compare the contribution of otherwise invisible areas to the economy as a whole (see Box 2.3).
A satellite account can be used to unearth fields or aspects of behaviour that are fully or partially hidden in the central national accounting framework. Tourism is a typical example. Many aspects of tourism are covered in detailed classifications of activities, products and purposes, but rarely appear separately with distinct classification codes. Instead of overburdening the central framework with too many subdivisions and detail, the System of National Accounts recommends the creation of satellite accounts that are consistent with, but not fully integrated, in the central framework (van de Ven, 2021[11]).
Source: Statistics Canada (2019[12]), “In-depth review of satellite accounting”, https://www.unece.org/stats/ces/in-depth-reviews/satellite-accounting.html.
Satellite accounts can provide more detail, rearrange concepts from the central statistical framework and provide supplementary information on specific domains of economic activities. The main motivation is to understand the structure and/or economic performance of an activity and/or sector. The most common satellite accounts cover tourism, environmental-economic linkages and health. Accounts have also been created for education and training, transport, aviation, and the non-profit sector. In terms of complexity, they can range from simple tables to an extended set of accounts. Data are often compiled less frequently and regularly than for standard national accounts.
Sources: Van de Ven (2021[11]), “Developing thematic satellite accounts”, https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/b833cbfa-en; United Nations Statistical Commission (2009[9]), System of National Accounts, https://unstats.un.org/unsd/nationalaccount/docs/sna2008.pdf; and Statistics Canada (2019[12]), “In-depth review of satellite accounting”,https://www.unece.org/stats/ces/in-depth-reviews/satellite-accounting.html.
In the United States, the Bureau of Economic Analysis has led an extensive project to measure the US space economy and its contribution to the national economy through two editions of a satellite account (BEA, 2020[13]). In addition to estimating the contribution of the space economy to the national gross domestic product (GDP), the US Space Economy Satellite Account (SESA) provides data on gross output, compensation, and employment in space industries (Highfill, Jouard and Franks, 2020[2]). The statistics produced through the account are consistent with the BEA’s core economic measures and can be used to compare the space sector to other US industries and the economy overall. Building the SESA account included isolating spending on space production by rearranging the BEA’s existing SUTs. The process involved the following elements:
Relevant products and services (“commodities”) were identified within BEA SUTs (Table 2.6). BEA consulted extensively with other public organisations (including the OECD) and industry experts in order to select the commodities measured (BEA, 2020[13]). Some 200 commodity codes and 28 NAICS regional industrial classification codes with space-related content have been identified. They are listed for information in Annex 2.A.
As most commodity categories include both space and non-space components, external data sources, mainly information on space-related revenue or spending, were used to estimate the share of each commodity that could be assigned to the space economy in the SUT.
Finally, BEA SUTs were used to determine total economic activity by industry.
Estimates for 2019 show that the US space economy accounted for USD 194.6 billion of gross output, contributed 0.6 percent (USD 120.3 billion) to current-dollar GDP and supported more than 356 000 private sector jobs (Highfill, Jouard and Franks, 2022[14]). Gross outputs by industry are summarised in Table 2.7.
The US satellite account represents a detailed estimation of the size of the space economy and is the first such account constructed in the world. Since its publication, a number of countries and organisations have started to explore the satellite accounting approach in coordination with national and regional statistical offices.
As an illustration, the French space agency (CNES) has recently begun a partnership with the French National Institute of Statistics and Economic Studies (INSEE) to develop a new strategy for measuring the space economy using a satellite account approach. Although the INSEE has led surveys on the aeronautics and space sector for decades, policy demand for detailed data on the French space economy is increasing (INSEE, 2021[15]). The space economy is experiencing rapid changes, and it is of growing strategic importance in French and European autonomy. It is also, like aeronautics, included into a series of large-scale governmental recovery plans following the COVID-19 crisis. The CNES and the INSEE will start in 2022 by targeting the upstream segment, but the goal is to extend the effort and include the downstream segment in the near future (Lafaye, 2021[16]). As another example, the European Space Agency has started co-operating with Eurostat to explore the possible development of a European-wide space economy satellite account, with a first workshop held in March 2022.
The preceding sections have illustrated concepts and definitions for space activities and outlined some of the ways that official statistics can be used in the measurement of the space economy. There are several significant challenges involved in this type of measurement.
With some minor exceptions (e.g. ISIC code 6130: “Satellite operations”), existing statistical classification systems do not define space activities in isolation to all other related activities. As noted in the previous Handbook, changing classifications by creating codes for specific space activities is a possibility, as the ISIC classification, for instance, is revised at regular intervals (OECD, 2012[1]). It is, however, a long process necessitating co-operation and support from national statistical agencies and will not guarantee that statistics will be produced at the required level of detail.
Targeted surveys and impact studies based on the results are likely to remain the most effective approach for analysing the space economy for most countries, as a first step: Industry surveys can provide very useful data points for developing potential future satellite accounts. Without the type of information collected in industry surveys, national statistical offices are unlikely to be able to produce an eventual satellite account. Chapter 3 provides more information on the cast of actors in the space economy, while Chapter 4 provides lessons learnt from countries and well-established industry associations on pursuing survey-based measurement of the space economy.
Space and statistical agencies are encouraged to be innovative in their use of different official data sources: Combining more granular data from administrative records with official data and tools emanating from the system of national accounts is likely to provide important results to policy makers as the US Space Satellite Account demonstrates well. Projects focused on identifying the contribution of space activities to national economies through national accounting frameworks can provide new and important information on the role played by the space economy in the wider economy. However, this type of study requires the active involvement of national statistical agencies with national space communities, and sustained funding.
Providing support for data collection and analysis represents the key focus in the following chapters of the Handbook.
When launching a satellite account, a list of adequate commodities needs to be identified to build up statistical tables (Highfill, Jouard and Franks, 2020[2]). As part of the US Space Economy Satellite Account (SESA), the US Bureau of Economic Analysis has (BEA) developed, with the support of many stakeholders in the space community and beyond, a list of 200 commodity codes that relate to space activities. These commodities and their codes are provided below for information purposes. They use long "NAICS-based codes", as in the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS), US industries are defined at the six-digit level. For use in its economic census and survey programmes, a number of administrations, including the BEA, have developed "NAICS-based codes" with codes greater than six digits to allow detailed analysis.
The following table provides some concordance for selected space products and services identified in European and international classifications at different digit levels. Relevant frameworks include the Statistical Classification of Economic Activities in the European Community (NACE), as well as the Statistical Classification of Products by Activity in the European Union, Version 2.1 (CPA). CPA is the European version of the CPC (Central Product Classifications) of the United Nations. It is more detailed, it has a slightly different structuring which corresponds at all levels to that of NACE. In addition, PRODCOM statistics aim at providing a full picture at European Union level of developments in industrial production for a given product or for an industry in a comparable manner across countries. PRODCOM uses an eight-digit numerical code, the first six digits of which are, in general, identical to those of the CPA code. The headings of the PRODCOM list are also derived from the international Harmonized System (HS) or the Combined Nomenclature (CN), which enables comparisons to be made between production statistics and foreign trade statistics.
References
[3] Australian Space Agency (2021), “Australian space sector economic report: 2016-17 to 2018-19”, Department of Industry, Science, Energy and Resources, Canberra, Australia, February 2021, https://www.industry.gov.au/data-and-publications/australian-space-sector-economic-report-2016-17-to-2018-19.
[13] BEA (2020), Exploring the Space Economy, webpage, United States Bureau of Economic Analysis, Department of Commerce, https://www.bea.gov/news/blog/2020-02-06/exploring-space-economy (accessed on 14 May 2020).
[10] Dialogic (2020), “Broad exploration of the added value of space travel for the Netherlands (Brede verkenning toegevoegde waarde ruimtevaart voor Nederland)”, Report commissioned by the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs and Climate Policy, https://www.dialogic.nl/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Eindrapport-Brede-verkenning-toegevoegde-waarde-ruimtevaart-voor-Nederland-oktober-2020.pdf (accessed on 11 March 2022).
[7] Eurostat (2008), “NACE Rev. 2: Statistical classification of economic activities in the European Community”, Eurostat Methodologies and Working Papers, Eurostat, Brussels, http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3859598/5902521/KS-RA-07-015-EN.PDF (accessed on 30 May 2017).
[14] Highfill, T., A. Jouard and C. Franks (2022), “Updated and revised estimates of the US space economy, 2012–2019”, Bureau of Economic Analysis, https://www.bea.gov/system/files/2022-01/Space-Economy-2012-2019.pdf (accessed on 7 March 2022).
[2] Highfill, T., A. Jouard and C. Franks (2020), “Preliminary estimates of the U.S. space economy, 2012–2018”, Survey of Current Business, No. 100, December, US Bureau Economic Analysis, Washington, DC, https://apps.bea.gov/scb/2020/12-december/1220-space-economy.htm (accessed on 21 June 2021).
[15] INSEE (2021), “Enquête sur la filière aéronautique et spatiale en 2020”, [2020 aerospace survey], (in French), 2021A058EC, National Institute of Statistics and Economic Studies, Paris, https://www.cnis.fr/enquetes/filiere-aeronautique-et-spatiale-en-2020-fas-2020-enquete-sur-la-2021a058ec/.
[16] Lafaye, M. (2021), “Towards a “Space” NACE for a statistical approach of space activities: CNES and INSEE partnership”, presentation at the OECD Space Forum Seminar on Space Economy Measurements and Surveys, 4 May 2021.
[6] NASA (2021), “Annual procurement report: Fiscal year 2020”, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC, https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/atoms/files/annual_procurement_report_fy20.pdf (accessed on 13 January 2022).
[1] OECD (2012), OECD Handbook on Measuring the Space Economy, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264169166-en.
[4] Olivari, M., C. Jolly and M. Undseth (2021), “Space technology transfers and their commercialisation”, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers, No. 116, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/0e78ff9f-en.
[12] Statistics Canada (2019), “In-depth review of satellite accounting”, ECE/CES/BUR/2019/FEB/2, 7 February, Meeting of the 2018/19 Bureau, United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/stats/documents/ece/ces/bur/2019/February/02_In-depth_review_of_satellite_accounts.pdf (accessed on 18 May 2020).
[8] UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs (2008), International Standard Industrial Classfication of All Economic Activities (ISIC): Rev. 4, United Nations, New York, http://unstats.un.org/unsd/publication/seriesM/seriesm_4rev4e.pdf (accessed on 28 November 2016).
[9] United Nations Statistical Commission (2009), System of National Accounts 2008, United Nations, New York, https://unstats.un.org/unsd/nationalaccount/docs/SNA2008.pdf (accessed on 1 June 2017).
[5] US Department of Commerce (2013), Space Deep Dive Government Survey, website, https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/space-deep-dive-govt (accessed on 1 February 2019).
[11] van de Ven, P. (2021), “Developing thematic satellite accounts: The example of a thematic satellite account for transport”, OECD Statistics Working Papers, No. 2021/02, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/b833cbfa-en.