copy the linklink copied!Annex A. Progress since the 2015 DAC peer review recommendations

copy the linklink copied!Towards a comprehensive Austrian development effort

copy the linklink copied!

Recommendations 2015

Progress

Austria should develop a clear approach to addressing policy incoherence, prioritising selected topics and mechanisms and including means of monitoring and reporting across government, while drawing on the expertise and analytical capacity existing in the country.

Not implemented

To ensure development effectiveness, Austria needs to set out clear developmental objectives and expected results of using ODA as a catalyst to leverage private investment.

Partially implemented

copy the linklink copied!Vision and policies for development co-operation

copy the linklink copied!

Recommendations 2015

Progress

Austria should bring all aid-spending ministries in line with, and make them accountable for, achieving the objectives of the three-year programmes.

Partially implemented

Having a clear rationale for allocating resources geographically, by channel and by instrument, would increase the predictability of Austrian aid.

Partially implemented

Austria is encouraged to clarify its priorities for mainstreaming cross-cutting themes, and to ensure that it has the tools and resources to follow through on these priorities.

Partially implemented

copy the linklink copied!Aid volume and allocation

copy the linklink copied!

Recommendations 2015

Progress

Austria should deliver on its commitment to develop a realistic time-bound roadmap to increase ODA in order to make progress towards meeting the 0.7% ODA/GNI target

Partially implemented

Austria should include debt relief in its ODA forecasts only after this is agreed by the Paris Club.

Not implemented

Austria should reverse the decline in the share of its ODA allocated to the LDCs, in keeping with its commitment to poverty reduction.

Partially implemented

copy the linklink copied!Organisation and management

copy the linklink copied!

Recommendations 2015

Progress

Austria should ensure that, when involved in the same priority countries, the federal ministries, ADA and the Austrian Development Bank agree on a set of common development objectives, elaborate joint country strategies, and report on a single set of country results.

Partially implemented

Austria needs to develop a staff development strategy to ensure that it has the competence and expertise to engage in and deliver quality aid in its priority partner countries.

Partially implemented

copy the linklink copied!Development co-operation delivery and partnerships

copy the linklink copied!

Recommendations 2015

Progress

Austria is encouraged to introduce a more comprehensive and systematic approach to risk management in its development co-operation programme, including at partner country level.

Partially implemented

Austria should reverse the decline in the share of its aid that is untied, bearing in mind the Accra and Busan commitments.

Partially implemented

Austria should engage more strategically with civil society in the countries where it works, based on clear guidelines.

Implemented

Austria should consistently apply a fragility lens to programming in fragile states.

Implemented

copy the linklink copied!Results and accountability

copy the linklink copied!

Recommendations 2015

Progress

Austria is encouraged to develop a consistent and coherent approach to development results as well as a system to inform programming decisions and serve accountability needs.

Partially implemented

Setting up an evaluation committee under an independent oversight body would contribute to increasing commitment at all levels to follow up on recommendations from evaluations.

Partially implemented

Having a more strategic approach to communicating about development results and risks, and increasing transparency on how ADC is working, would contribute to promoting a culture that is more open to public information.

Partially implemented

copy the linklink copied!Humanitarian assistance

copy the linklink copied!

Recommendations 2015

Progress

Austria should reflect on its humanitarian achievements, and develop a strategic focus and allocation criteria for its humanitarian programme, in order to increase predictability, facilitate performance monitoring, and to raise its profile on the international stage.

Partially implemented

Commitments to scale up the humanitarian budget should be kept, so that Austria can match its strategic ambitions with adequate resources.

Implemented

copy the linklink copied!
Figure A.1. Austria’s implementation of 2015 peer review recommendations
Figure A.1. Austria’s implementation of 2015 peer review recommendations

Metadata, Legal and Rights

This document, as well as any data and map included herein, are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. Extracts from publications may be subject to additional disclaimers, which are set out in the complete version of the publication, available at the link provided.

https://doi.org/10.1787/03b626d5-en

© OECD 2020

The use of this work, whether digital or print, is governed by the Terms and Conditions to be found at http://www.oecd.org/termsandconditions.