Iceland

This country note provides an overview of the key characteristics of the education system in Iceland. It draws on data from Education at a Glance 2023. In line with the thematic focus of this year’s Education at a Glance, it emphasises vocational education and training (VET), while also covering other parts of the education system. Data in this note are provided for the latest available year. Readers interested in the reference years for the data are referred to the corresponding tables in Education at a Glance 2023.

  • High-quality VET programmes integrate learners into labour markets and open pathways for further personal and professional development. However, the quality and importance of VET programmes differ greatly across countries. In some countries, half of all young adults (25-34 year-olds) have a vocational qualification as their highest level of educational attainment, while the share is in the low single digits in other countries. In Iceland, 15% of 25-34 year-olds have a VET qualification as their highest level of attainment: 12% at upper secondary level and 3% at post-secondary non-tertiary level (Figure 1).

  • Although an upper secondary qualification is often the minimum attainment needed for successful labour-market participation, some 25-34 year-olds still leave education without such a qualification. On average across the OECD, 14% of young adults have not attained an upper secondary qualification. In Iceland, the share is higher than the OECD average (23%).

  • Tertiary attainment continues to increase among the working age population. On average across the OECD, tertiary attainment is becoming as common as upper secondary or post-secondary non-tertiary attainment among 25-64 year-olds. In Iceland, 44% of 25-64 year-olds have tertiary attainment, a larger share than those that have upper secondary or post-secondary non-tertiary attainment (34%).

  • On average across OECD countries, 14.7% of young adults aged 18-24 are not in education, employment or training (NEET), while in Iceland the corresponding figure is 5.9%. Reducing NEET rates among young adults is a particularly important challenge in all countries because those who become NEET face worse labour-market outcomes later in life than their peers who remained in education or training at this age.

  • As the demand for skills in the workplace changes ever more quickly, the importance of lifelong learning continues to grow. In Iceland, the share of adults who participated in non-formal job-related education over a four-week reference period is 12% among 25-64 year-olds with vocational upper secondary or post-secondary non-tertiary attainment, 10% among those with general upper secondary or post-secondary non-tertiary attainment and 22% among those with tertiary attainment. This compares to average shares of 7% (vocational upper secondary or post-secondary non-tertiary attainment), 7% (general upper secondary or post-secondary non-tertiary attainment) and 14% (tertiary) across the OECD.

  • Participation in high-quality early childhood education (ECE) has a positive effect on children’s well-being, learning and development in the first years of their lives. In Iceland, 94% of 2-year-olds are enrolled in ECE. This increases to 97% of 3-year-olds, 97% of 4-year-olds and 97% of 5-year-olds.

  • Compulsory education in Iceland starts at the age of 6 and continues until the age of 16. Students typically graduate between the ages of 18 and 19 from general upper secondary programmes. The age range for completing vocational programmes is wider, with students typically graduating from vocational upper secondary programmes between 18 and 25. This is similar to most OECD countries, where graduates from vocational upper secondary programmes have a wider age range, reflecting the greater diversity of pathways into these programmes than for general ones.

  • The large majority of 15-19 year-olds across the OECD are enrolled in education. In Iceland, 53% of this age group are enrolled in general upper secondary education and 11% in vocational upper secondary education. A further 20% are enrolled in lower secondary programmes and 4% in tertiary programmes. This compares to an OECD average of 37% enrolled in general upper secondary programmes, 23% in vocational upper secondary programmes, 12% in lower secondary programmes and 12% in tertiary programmes (Figure 2).

  • On average across countries and other participants with comparable data, 77% of entrants into general upper secondary education successfully complete their upper secondary studies (either in general or in vocational programmes) within the theoretical duration of the programme. The completion rate increases by an average 10 percentage points within two years after the end of the theoretical duration. In Iceland, 64% of entrants into general upper secondary education complete their programme within the theoretical duration, but this share increases to 73% after allowing an additional two years.

  • In most countries with available data, completion rates in vocational upper secondary programmes are lower than in general upper secondary programmes. In Iceland, 40% of vocational students complete upper secondary education (either general or vocational programmes) within the expected duration and 51% complete their programme after an additional two years. On average across countries and other participants with available data, 62% of vocational entrants complete their studies on time and 73% within an additional two years.

  • In some countries, most students enrol in another education programme shortly after completing their upper secondary education. In other countries, it is common for upper secondary graduates to enter the labour market or take a gap year and return to education later. Consequently, the share of general upper secondary graduates in education one year after their graduation ranges from less than 40% in Sweden to more than 90% in Slovenia. In all countries, general upper secondary graduates are more likely to be enrolled in formal education one year after their graduation than those who graduated from a VET programme. In Iceland, 44% of general upper secondary graduates are in education one year after their graduation compared to 28% of vocational graduates.

  • Bachelor’s programmes are the most popular programmes for new entrants to tertiary education. On average across the OECD, they attract 76% of all new students compared to 93% in Iceland. Short-cycle tertiary programmes are the second most common level of education for new entrants into tertiary education, but their importance differs widely across countries. In Iceland, they are chosen by 6% of all new entrants.

  • Perhaps surprisingly, the share of international students at tertiary level has not been negatively affected by the COVID-19 pandemic in many OECD countries. However, a few countries experienced double digit declines in the share of international students. Iceland is not one of them, as the share of international students remained stable between 2019 and 2021 (8% of all tertiary students).

  • All OECD and partner countries devote a substantial share of their domestic output to education. In 2020, OECD countries spent on average 5.1% of their gross domestic product (GDP) on primary to tertiary educational institutions. In Iceland, the corresponding share was 6.3% of GDP, of which 40% was dedicated to primary education, 18% to lower secondary education, 19% to upper secondary education, 1% to post-secondary non-tertiary education, 1% to short-cycle tertiary programmes and 21% to bachelor's, master's and doctoral or equivalent programmes (Figure 3).

  • Funding for education in absolute terms is strongly influenced by countries’ income levels. Countries with higher per capita GDP tend to spend more per student than those with lower per capita GDP. Across all levels from primary to tertiary education, Iceland spends USD 15 444 annually per full-time equivalent student (adjusted for purchasing power), compared to the OECD average of USD 12 647. Expenditure per student is equivalent to 28% of per capita GDP, which is slightly above the OECD average of 27%.

  • The COVID-19 pandemic has created unprecedented challenges for education systems across the world. On average across the OECD, expenditure on primary to tertiary educational institutions per full-time equivalent student (including expenditure on research and development) grew by 0.4% from 2019 to 2020 (the first year of the pandemic and the latest period with available data). In Iceland, it decreased by 0.2%. This change in expenditure per student is the result of total expenditure on educational institutions increasing by 2.3% and the total number of full-time equivalent students increasing by 2.6%.

  • The distribution of spending between general and vocational upper secondary programmes depends on a variety of factors, such as the number of VET students, the fields of study within VET programmes and the importance given to VET relative to general programmes. In Iceland, 13% of all funding for educational institutions is spent on general upper secondary education and 7% on vocational upper secondary education (11% and 10% respectively on average across the OECD).

  • Government sources dominate non-tertiary education funding in all OECD countries, while the private sector contributes 9% of the total expenditure on educational institutions on average. Private funding in Iceland accounted for 3% of expenditure at primary, secondary and post-secondary non-tertiary levels.

  • In most countries, private sources accounted for similar shares of expenditure on general and vocational programmes at upper secondary level. However, in a few countries the differences in the share of private funding between general and vocational programmes were wider. In Iceland, the private sector is responsible for 9% of expenditure on general upper secondary programmes and 9% of expenditure on vocational upper secondary programmes.

  • On average across OECD countries, more than half of government expenditure on primary to post-secondary non-tertiary education comes from subnational governments. In Iceland, 24% of the funding comes from the central government, after transfers between government levels and 76% from the local level.

  • The total compulsory instruction time throughout primary and lower secondary education varies widely from country to country (Figure 4). Across the OECD, over the course of primary and lower secondary education, compulsory instruction time totals an average of 7 634 hours, distributed over nine grades. In Iceland, the total compulsory instruction time is lower, at 7 616 hours, over 10 grades.

  • On average across OECD countries, 25% of the compulsory instruction time in primary education is devoted to reading, writing and literature and 16% to mathematics. In lower secondary education, the share is 15% for reading, writing and literature and 13% for mathematics. In Iceland, 20% of time is devoted to reading, writing and literature and 16% to mathematics at primary level compared to 14% each to both subjects at lower secondary level.

  • Besides average teacher salaries themselves, annual teaching time requirements, annual hours of compulsory instruction time for students, and class size also impact total spending on teacher salaries. When combined, these factors can be used to estimate an average cost of salaries per student and show the relative impact of each individual factor on total salary spending. Total teacher salary costs per primary student are USD 5 075 in Iceland, higher than the OECD average of USD 3 614. This difference can be broken down into these four factors: higher teacher salaries increase costs (by USD 429), below-average teaching hours increase costs (by USD 1 007), below-average student instruction time reduces costs (by USD 404) and smaller classes increase costs (by USD 430).

References

OECD (2023), Education at a Glance 2023 Sources, Methodologies and Technical Notes, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/d7f76adc-en.

OECD (2023), Education at a Glance Database, https://stats.oecd.org/.

OECD (2023), Education at a Glance 2023: OECD Indicators, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/e13bef63-en.

[1]

[2]

[3]

For more information on Education at a Glance 2023 and to access the full set of indicators, see: https://doi.org/10.1787/e13bef63-en.

For more information on the methodology used during the data collection for each indicator, the references to the sources and the specific notes for each country, see Education at a Glance 2023 Sources, Methodologies and Technical Notes (https://doi.org/10.1787/d7f76adc-en).

For general information on the methodology, please refer to the OECD Handbook for Internationally Comparative Education Statistics 2018 (https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264304444-en).

Updated data can be found on line at https://doi.org/10.1787/eag-data-en and by following the StatLinks 2 under the tables and charts in the publication.

Explore, compare and visualise more data and analysis using the Education GPS:

https://gpseducation.oecd.org/.

This work is published under the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD. The opinions expressed and arguments employed herein do not necessarily reflect the official views of OECD member countries.

This document, as well as any data and any map included herein, are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area.

The statistical data for Israel are supplied by and under the responsibility of the relevant Israeli authorities. The use of such data by the OECD is without prejudice to the status of the Golan Heights, East Jerusalem and Israeli settlements in the West Bank under the terms of international law.

The use of this work, whether digital or print, is governed by the terms and conditions to be found at www.oecd.org/termsandconditions/.

Metadata, Legal and Rights

This document, as well as any data and map included herein, are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. Extracts from publications may be subject to additional disclaimers, which are set out in the complete version of the publication, available at the link provided.

© OECD 2023

The use of this work, whether digital or print, is governed by the Terms and Conditions to be found at https://www.oecd.org/termsandconditions.