Singapore

First reporting fiscal year: Commencing on or after 1 January 2017. Singapore also allowed MNE Groups to file a CbC report on a voluntary basis, for reporting fiscal years commencing between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2016.

Consolidated group revenue threshold: SGD 1.125 billion

Filing deadline: 12 months following the end of the reporting fiscal year

Local filing required: No

Surrogate parent entity filing permitted: Yes

First review of the domestic legal framework: 2017/2018

Singapore has implemented a CbCR notification requirement for Singapore-headquartered MNE Groups in respect of CbC reports for financial periods beginning on or after 1 January 2022.1

Singapore has revised its penalty provisions to increase the monetary penalties in respect of non-filing and late filing of a CbC report and include the monetary penalties in respect of non-filing of the abovementioned notification.2

Singapore confirms that its rules have not changed and continue to be applied effectively.3 Singapore continues to meet all terms of reference. 4 5 6 7

Singapore notified that it made two exchanges of CbC reports after the deadline. This was caused by a technical issue with the exchange of information portal which has since been resolved and so no recommendation is required.

Singapore confirms that its rules have not changed and continue to be applied effectively. Singapore continues to meet all terms of reference.

Singapore confirms that its rules have not changed and continue to be applied effectively. Singapore continues to meet all terms of reference.

Notes

← 1. https://sso.agc.gov.sg/SL-Supp/S75-2018/Published/20180205?DocDate=20180205.

← 2. https://sso.agc.gov.sg/Act/ITA1947.

← 3. Singapore has clarified that the Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters has been incorporated in the domestic tax law and entered into force on 1 May 2016.

← 4. Singapore’s 2017/2018 peer review included a monitoring point in relation to a “designation provision”. This monitoring point remains in place.

← 5. Singapore’s 2017/2018 peer review included a monitoring point in relation to the ability of the Comptroller to allow a CbC report to be filed later than the filing deadline as set in the regulations. This monitoring point remains in place.

← 6. Singapore’s 2017/2018 peer review included a monitoring point whereby if local filing requirements were introduced, these requirements should comply with the terms of reference under paragraph 8 (c). This monitoring point remains in place.

← 7. Singapore’s 2017/2018 peer review included a monitoring point whereby if local filing requirements were introduced, these requirements should be deactivated in case of surrogate filing in a manner consistent with the terms of reference under paragraph 8 (d). This monitoring point remains in place.

Metadata, Legal and Rights

This document, as well as any data and map included herein, are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. Extracts from publications may be subject to additional disclaimers, which are set out in the complete version of the publication, available at the link provided.

© OECD 2023

The use of this work, whether digital or print, is governed by the Terms and Conditions to be found at https://www.oecd.org/termsandconditions.