7. Monitoring framework

Establishing a circular economy monitoring framework is crucial for assessing progress towards the targets and goals outlined in the roadmap over time and the circular economy transition in Albania more generally, using a set of indicators. This framework will assist Albanian policy makers in comprehending the country’s performance on selected circular economy indicators and pinpoint areas that require further intervention. The monitoring process should also serve as the foundation for setting new long-term priorities for the circular economy (European Commission, 2023[1]) and offer feedback for strategy and planning development for various actors in the economy (Alaerts et al., 2019[2]). This aligns with the dual purpose of indicators: forward-looking to provide guidance and backward-looking to provide feedback and assess performance (Ekins et al., 2019[3]).

A circular economy monitoring framework can take a variety of forms, drawing upon an extensive array of existing indicators and those under development. Existing circular economy monitoring frameworks encompass a broader collection of relevant indicators, recognising the difficulty of capturing the circular economy through a single indicator due to its cross-cutting and wide-ranging definition. These monitoring frameworks can adopt the structure of a set of individual indicators, not necessarily linked, or they can be organised using a multi-tiered approach with a limited number of headline indicators (for communication purposes), complemented by a dashboard featuring specific thematic indicators. Employing a multi-layered approach allows for incorporating more detailed information at additional levels (e.g. regional, city, sectoral or product groups levels) or concerning specific strategic objectives and recommendations.

Academic literature strongly advocates moving beyond commonly used macro-level indicators to include indicators that offer direct feedback to policy makers on specific products and services, and that address consumer and business behaviour, as well as societal needs, related to the circular economy (Alaerts et al., 2019[2]; Ekins et al., 2019[3]; Giljum et al., 2011[4]; Potting et al., 2018[5]). Moreover, there is a need for supplementary indicators to precisely measure the effects and process of the transition itself, connecting the circular economy to environmental impacts while capturing possible rebound effects (Potting et al., 2018[5]; Alaerts et al., 2019[2]).

The proposed monitoring framework to support the implementation of the recommendations of the roadmap (Table 7.1) has a two-tier structure:

  1. 1. A set of headline indicators to monitor the economy-wide circular transition in Albania (Table 7.2). These indicators are largely based on the European Union’s circular economy monitoring framework (Eurostat, 2023[6]) and are grouped into five categories: 1) production and consumption; 2) waste management; 3) secondary raw materials; 4) competitiveness and innovation; and 5) global sustainability and resilience.

  2. 2. Additionally, a set of indicators per priority area to monitor the progress made on specific recommendations (Table 7.3). Some of these indicators could be qualitative, for instance, certain operational indicators monitoring the progress made on a specific recommendation (e.g. the implementation has started, is ongoing or completed). Others are currently at an experimental stage, requiring further development of the indicator or additional data collection (e.g. monitoring the revenues generated from specific environmental taxes).

The proposed sets of indicators intend to provide a comprehensive overview of relevant indicators that can help monitor the implementation of the recommendations as well as Albania’s overall circular economy transition. Albania may want to consider these all-encompassing lists of indicators during the preparation of the future policy framework or an action plan and select those for which data are or might become available. That said, to ensure effective and evidence-based policy making, data collection and co-ordination of the collection process should be improved, and existing gaps in the availability and quality of key circular economy-related data should be addressed, starting with those related to waste generation and waste management. Establishing an impact assessment mechanism is a potential solution to ensure that the monitoring framework is effectively executed and to secure its long-term continuity.

References

[2] Alaerts, L. et al. (2019), “Towards a more direct policy feedback in circular economy monitoring via a societal needs perspective”, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Vol. 149, pp. 363-371, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.06.004.

[3] Ekins, P. et al. (2019), “The circular economy: What, why, how and where”, Background paper for an OECD/EC Workshop on 5 July 2019, https://www.oecd.org/cfe/regionaldevelopment/Ekins-2019-Circular-Economy-What-Why-How-Where.pdf.

[1] European Commission (2023), Communication on a Revised Monitoring Framework for the Circular Economy, European Commission, Brussels, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM%3A2023%3A306%3AFIN&qid=1684143860344.

[6] Eurostat (2023), “Circular Economy Monitoring Framework”, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/circular-economy/monitoring-framework (accessed on 27 November 2023).

[4] Giljum, S. et al. (2011), “A comprehensive set of resource use indicators from the micro to the macro level”, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Vol. 55/3, pp. 300-308, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.09.009.

[7] OECD (2021), The OECD Inventory of Circular Economy indicators, OECD, Paris, https://www.oecd.org/cfe/cities/InventoryCircularEconomyIndicators.pdf.

[5] Potting, J. et al. (2018), Circular Economy: What We Want to Know and Can Measure – Framework and Baseline Assessment for Monitoring the Progress of the Circular Economy in the Netherlands, PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, The Hague, https://www.pbl.nl/sites/default/files/downloads/pbl-2018-circular-economy-what-we-want-to-know-and-can-measure-3217.pdf.

Legal and rights

This document, as well as any data and map included herein, are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. Extracts from publications may be subject to additional disclaimers, which are set out in the complete version of the publication, available at the link provided.

© OECD 2024

The use of this work, whether digital or print, is governed by the Terms and Conditions to be found at https://www.oecd.org/termsandconditions.