... your login credentials do not authorize you to access this content in the selected format. Access to this content in this format requires a current subscription or a prior purchase. Please select the WEB or READ option instead (if available). Or consider purchasing the publication.
OECD Multilingual Summaries
TALIS 2018 Results (Volume II)
Teachers and School Leaders as Valued Professionals
The skillset required to be an effective teacher is expansive and complex. On top
of being knowledgeable about their subject and how to teach it, teachers are also
expected to be experts in child development, classroom management, administration,
and even psychology, and to update their knowledge base throughout their career. It
is for these reasons that teaching is referred to as a “profession” rather than simply
a “job”. Likewise, the expectations for school leaders have gone beyond their traditional
role as administrators, and now include team leadership, instruction, networking and
effective communication with parents and other stakeholders. But the “professionalism”
of teachers and principals varies in its forms across countries and contexts, and
can be influenced both by policy and the behaviour of teachers and school leaders
themselves.
The extent to which teachers and school leaders live up to this status of professionals
in the 48 countries surveyed is the main focus of the 2018 cycle of the Teaching and
Learning International Survey (TALIS).
TALIS aims to give teachers and school leaders a voice on this issue by asking them
about their working life in school, covering everything from the characteristics of
their school environment and how they interact with colleagues, to teaching practices
and participation in continuous professional development.
Teacher professionalism is analysed in TALIS 2018 by looking at five pillars: the
knowledge and skills required to teach; career opportunities and working regulations;
the collaborative culture among teachers; the responsibility and autonomy afforded
to teachers; and the status and standing of the profession. This second volume, Teachers
and School Leaders as Valued Professionals, addresses the final four pillars: prestige,
career opportunities, collaboration and autonomy.
How do society and teachers view the teaching profession?
Whether a career is seen as prestigious or not can have an impact on both the kinds
of candidates that enter the profession and the job satisfaction of those already
in it. The majority of teachers in OECD countries and economies in TALIS (90%) are
satisfied with their job, and most of them (91%) do not regret becoming a teacher.
Despite this, an average of only 26% of teachers in OECD countries and economies participating
in TALIS think that the work they do is valued by society. Longer‑serving teachers
are also more likely than their younger colleagues to say that the profession is undervalued,
suggesting a degree of professional disillusionment as teachers progress along the
career path. Furthermore, 14% of teachers aged 50 years or less express a desire to
leave teaching within the next five years, i.e. well before they reach retirement
age.
Acute stress at work is also strongly associated with teachers’ job satisfaction and
their intention to continue teaching: 18% of teachers report experiencing a lot of
stress in their work, and 49% report that having too much administrative work is one
of the main sources of stress.
What are the main features of teachers’ employment contracts and how do they feel
about it?
The majority of teachers in OECD countries and economies in TALIS are employed on
permanent contracts, with only 18% reporting that their employment contract is temporary.
But this figure jumps to 48% for teachers under the age of 30. While temporary contracts
offer some flexibility, teachers working under contracts of less than one year also
report feeling less confident in their ability to teach in roughly one third of the
countries surveyed.
In terms of salaries, 39% of teachers and 47% of principals are satisfied with the
pay they receive, on average across OECD countries and economies in TALIS. It is not
particularly common for appraisal processes to be tied to career progression in the
form of pay increases or a bonus, with an average of only 41% of teachers reporting
that this happens in their school. However, the proportion of teachers working in
schools where this does happen has increased significantly since the last cycle of
TALIS in over half the participating countries and economies. It should also be noted
that this practice is more likely to occur when the school management team has some
authority over teachers’ salaries.
Teachers who report that their school provides staff with opportunities to actively
participate in school decisions and supports their professional development are also
more likely to say that they are satisfied with the conditions of their employment
contract (apart from salaries).
How do teachers work together as professionals and what impact does this have?
Central to many professions is a core network of practitioners who collaborate regularly.
In teaching, such professional collaboration takes the form of team teaching, providing
feedback after classroom observations, engaging in joint activities across different
classes, and participating in collaboration‑based professional development. Teachers
in OECD countries and economies in TALIS are quite likely to employ basic collaborative
practices like discussing the development of specific students with colleagues (61%
of teachers on average do this) and, to a lesser extent, exchanging teaching materials
with colleagues (47%). However, far fewer teachers engage in the deeper forms of professional
collaboration, which involve more interdependence between teachers, with only 9% of
teachers saying they provide observation‑based feedback to colleagues, and 21% engaging
in collaborative professional learning at least once a month.
Such low instances of professional collaboration may be worrisome, considering the
impact collaboration can have on promoting 21st century teaching: teachers who regularly
collaborate with peers in this way also tend to report using cognitive activation
practices more frequently in class). Professional collaboration is also associated
with higher job satisfaction and teacher self‑efficacy.
Feedback from peers is a unique form of collaboration that puts teachers at the centre
as experts of their own practice. On average across OECD countries and economies,
71% of teachers who received feedback from colleagues found it useful for their teaching.
Feedback appears to be most effective for teachers when it is delivered in a variety
of ways, rather just one repeated method.
How much control do teachers and school leaders have over their practice and their
working environment?
The practice of teaching in class remains at the teacher’s discretion: over 90% of
teachers say that it is up to them to select teaching methods, assess students’ learning,
discipline students and set the amount of homework to assign. Determining the overall
course content, however, appears slightly less commonly within the teacher’s purview,
with only 84% of teachers reporting that they have some control over this.
More efforts should be made to involve teachers in the decision‑making processes of
their schools. On average across OECD countries and economies in TALIS, only 56% of
principals report that teachers have a role in the school management team. In addition,
only 42% of principals report that their teachers have a significant responsibility
over a large share of tasks related to school policies, curriculum and instruction.
Teachers also have little responsibility over staffing and budgets; but budget allocation
appears to still be within the school’s control, with 68% of principals reporting
that schools have significant responsibility in this area.