Annex D. Detailed tables
|
Table A D.1. Government financing of adult learning across OECD countries
|
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
Responses by country
|
|||
|
|
Percentage of public education spending that currently goes to adult learning |
Development of public spending on adult learning as a proportion of public spending on education between 2009 and 2014 |
Government's plan to increase or decrease spending on adult learning |
|
Australia |
n.a. |
Stayed the same |
n.a. |
|
Austria |
n.a. |
Stayed the same |
Plans to stay the same |
|
Czech Republic |
Do not know/figures not available |
Increased |
Plans to stay the same |
|
Denmark |
4% or more |
Increased |
Plans to stay the same |
|
Spain |
4% or more |
Increased |
Plans to stay the same |
|
Estonia |
Do not know/figures not available |
n.a. |
Plans to increase |
|
Finland |
4% or more |
Stayed the same |
Plans to stay the same |
|
France |
n.a. |
Increased |
Plans to increase |
|
Greece |
0.5%-0.9% |
Increased |
n.a. |
|
Hungary |
2%-3.9% |
Decreased |
Plans to increase |
|
Ireland |
4% or more |
Stayed the same |
Plans to stay the same |
|
Iceland |
n.a. |
n.a. |
Plans to stay the same |
|
Israel |
0-0.4% |
Increased |
n.a. |
|
Korea |
1%-1.9% |
Increased |
Plans to stay the same |
|
Lithuania |
n.a. |
n.a. |
Plans to increase |
|
Luxembourg |
4% or more |
n.a. |
Plans to increase |
|
Latvia |
0-0.4% |
Stayed the same |
Plans to increase |
|
Mexico |
1%-1.9% |
Stayed the same |
Plans to stay the same |
|
Netherlands |
0-0.4% |
Decreased |
Plans to stay the same |
|
Norway |
4% or more |
Increased |
n.a. |
|
New Zealand |
4% or more |
Increased |
Plans to stay the same |
|
Poland |
n.a. |
Stayed the same |
Plans to increase |
|
Slovak Republic |
Do not know/figures not available |
Increased |
Plans to increase |
|
Slovenia |
0.5%-0.9% |
Decreased |
Plans to stay the same |
|
Sweden |
4% or more |
Stayed the same |
Plans to increase |
|
Switzerland |
0-0.4% |
Stayed the same |
Plans to increase |
|
Turkey |
2%-3.9% |
Increased |
Plans to increase |
|
USA |
0-0.4% |
Stayed the same |
Plans to stay the same |
|
Note: Question 4.1: What percentage of public education spending currently goes to AEL?; Question 4.2: Between 2009 and 2014, public spending on ALE as a proportion of public education spending in my country has:…; Question 4.3: Does the government plan to increase or decrease spending on ALE?; n.a. indicates that the country did not give a response to the question in the survey. |
|||
|
Source: Authors’ elaborations based on UNESCO GRALE III Survey. |
|||
|
Table A D.2. Governance of adult learning systems between 2009 and 2014
|
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Country responses to the question “Which of these statements apply to your country: Since 2009, the governance of ALE has…”
|
||||||
|
|
Increased stakeholder participation |
Developed more effective monitoring and evaluation systems |
Introduced better coordination arrangements |
Become more decentralized |
Strengthened capacity-building initiatives |
Strengthened inter-ministerial cooperation |
|
Australia |
Agree |
Tend to agree |
Agree |
Tend to disagree |
Agree |
Agree |
|
Austria |
Tend to agree |
Agree |
Tend to agree |
Tend to disagree |
Tend to agree |
Agree |
|
Belgium |
Agree |
Agree |
Agree |
Disagree |
Agree |
Agree |
|
Canada |
n.a. |
n.a. |
n.a. |
Tend to disagree |
n.a. |
Tend to agree |
|
Czech Republic |
Tend to agree |
Tend to agree |
Tend to agree |
Disagree |
Disagree |
Tend to agree |
|
Germany |
Tend to agree |
Tend to agree |
Tend to disagree |
Tend to agree |
Tend to disagree |
Tend to disagree |
|
Denmark |
Tend to agree |
Agree |
Agree |
Agree |
Agree |
Tend to disagree |
|
Spain |
Tend to agree |
Agree |
Agree |
Tend to agree |
Agree |
Agree |
|
Estonia |
Agree |
Tend to agree |
Tend to agree |
Tend to disagree |
Agree |
Agree |
|
Finland |
Tend to agree |
Disagree |
Tend to disagree |
Disagree |
Tend to disagree |
Tend to agree |
|
France |
Agree |
Tend to agree |
Agree |
Agree |
Agree |
Tend to agree |
|
Greece |
Tend to agree |
Tend to agree |
Tend to agree |
Agree |
Tend to disagree |
Tend to disagree |
|
Hungary |
Agree |
Tend to agree |
Tend to agree |
Disagree |
Agree |
Tend to agree |
|
Ireland |
Tend to agree |
n.a. |
Tend to agree |
Disagree |
n.a. |
Tend to agree |
|
Israel |
Tend to agree |
Disagree |
Tend to agree |
Agree |
Agree |
Tend to agree |
|
Japan |
n.a. |
n.a. |
Tend to agree |
n.a. |
Tend to agree |
Tend to agree |
|
Korea |
Agree |
Agree |
Agree |
Agree |
Agree |
Agree |
|
Lithuania |
Tend to agree |
Tend to agree |
Agree |
Tend to agree |
Agree |
Tend to agree |
|
Luxembourg |
Agree |
Agree |
Agree |
|
Tend to agree |
Tend to agree |
|
Latvia |
Agree |
Tend to disagree |
Tend to disagree |
Tend to agree |
Tend to agree |
n.a. |
|
Mexico |
Agree |
Tend to agree |
Tend to agree |
Tend to agree |
Agree |
Agree |
|
Netherlands |
Agree |
Agree |
Agree |
Agree |
Agree |
Agree |
|
Norway |
Tend to agree |
Tend to agree |
Agree |
Tend to agree |
Agree |
Agree |
|
New Zealand |
Agree |
Agree |
Agree |
Agree |
Agree |
Agree |
|
Poland |
Tend to agree |
Tend to agree |
Tend to disagree |
Tend to disagree |
Tend to disagree |
Tend to agree |
|
Portugal |
Tend to disagree |
Tend to agree |
Tend to agree |
Tend to disagree |
Tend to agree |
Agree |
|
Slovak Republic |
Agree |
Agree |
Agree |
Tend to disagree |
Agree |
Agree |
|
Slovenia |
Tend to disagree |
Tend to disagree |
Tend to disagree |
Disagree |
Disagree |
Tend to agree |
|
Sweden |
Tend to agree |
Tend to agree |
Tend to agree |
Tend to disagree |
Tend to agree |
Tend to agree |
|
Switzerland |
Tend to agree |
Tend to disagree |
Tend to disagree |
Tend to disagree |
Agree |
Tend to disagree |
|
Turkey |
Agree |
Agree |
Agree |
Disagree |
Agree |
Agree |
|
USA |
Agree |
Agree |
Agree |
n.a. |
Agree |
Agree |
|
Note: Question 3.1: Which of these statements apply to your country?; n.a. indicates that the country did not give a response to the question in the survey. |
||||||
|
Source: UNESCO GRALE III Survey. |
||||||
|
Table A D.3. Consultation with stakeholders and civil society about the formulation, implementation, and evaluation of adult learning policies
since 2009
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Yes |
Not yet, but the government plans to do so |
No, and not foreseen |
Not answered |
|
Australia |
|
|
|
x |
|
Austria |
x |
|
|
|
|
Belgium |
x |
|
|
|
|
Canada |
x |
|
|
|
|
Chile |
|
|
x |
|
|
Czech Republic |
|
x |
|
|
|
Germany |
x |
|
|
|
|
Denmark |
x |
|
|
|
|
Spain |
x |
|
|
|
|
Estonia |
x |
|
|
|
|
Finland |
x |
|
|
|
|
France |
x |
|
|
|
|
United Kingdom |
|
|
x |
|
|
Greece |
x |
|
|
|
|
Hungary |
x |
|
|
|
|
Ireland |
x |
|
|
|
|
Iceland |
|
|
x |
|
|
Israel |
x |
|
|
|
|
Italy |
|
|
x |
|
|
Japan |
x |
|
|
|
|
Korea |
x |
|
|
|
|
Lithuania |
x |
|
|
|
|
Luxembourg |
|
|
x |
|
|
Latvia |
x |
|
|
|
|
Mexico |
x |
|
|
|
|
Netherlands |
x |
|
|
|
|
Norway |
x |
|
|
|
|
New Zealand |
x |
|
|
|
|
Poland |
x |
|
|
|
|
Portugal |
|
|
x |
|
|
Slovak Republic |
x |
|
|
|
|
Slovenia |
x |
|
|
|
|
Sweden |
x |
|
|
|
|
Switzerland |
|
x |
|
|
|
Turkey |
x |
|
|
|
|
USA |
x |
|
|
|
|
Note: Question 3.2: Since 2009, has the government consulted stakeholders and civil society about the formulation, implementation and evaluation of ALE policies? |
||||
|
Source: (UNESCO, 2016[1]). |
||||