Chapter 7. Plan of Action to implement the Recommendations of the OECD Integrity Review of Nuevo León
This chapter presents an action plan for the implementation of the OECD recommendations in the areas covered by the Integrity Review of Nuevo León, namely: institutional arrangements, a strategic approach to public integrity, a culture of integrity, an open organisational culture, a whole-of-society approach to integrity, internal control and risk management. This chapter provides a list of the main activities, actions and steps to be taken for the implementation of each recommendation in the Review, and suggests which government entities are best suited to carrying them out.
CHAPTER 1
Building an inclusive integrity system in Nuevo León
1. Proposal for action: The governing bodies of Nuevo León’s Local Anti-corruption System should ensure the involvement and contribution of all institutions dealing with central government co-ordination and integrity-related topics in the executive branch.
2. Proposal for action: The Executive Secretariat of the SEANL could create two consultative sub-commissions
3. Proposal for action: Members of the SEANL could nominate a contact point or unit to liaise with governing bodies and mainstream integrity policies in the whole of government.
4. Proposal for action: The Government of Nuevo León should promote co-ordination with municipalities and support them in actively participating in the SEANL.
Setting a coherent institutional framework to implement and mainstream integrity policies
5. Proposal for action: The Government of Nuevo León could create a new unit in the Office of the Comptroller responsible for conflict of interest and ethics policies of the executive branch.
6. Proposal for action: The Government of Nuevo León could establish Integrity Contact Points to mainstream integrity policies and practices in government entities.
Demonstrating high-level commitment to enhance public integrity
7. Proposal for action: All institutions responsible for setting up the SEANL, especially the legislative branch and the SEANL’s members, should display high-level commitment to the system and help support it with pending laws and regulation.
8. Proposal for action Allocate adequate resources and tap into potential synergies by all the institutions represented by the SEANL’s members.
9. Proposal for action: SEANL could introduce mechanisms could be introduced to ensure the accountability of its members for the implementation as well as for the awareness among public officials.
CHAPTER 2
Reinforcing the strategy to prevent corruption
10. Proposal for action: The work of the Nuevo León Strategic Planning Council (Nuevo León Council) to define an integrity and anti-corruption strategy could be enhanced by setting clear objectives and formulating new indicators.
11. Proposal for action: The SEANL should establish close collaboration with the National Anti-corruption System and the Nuevo León Council, to ensure coherence of the integrity policies with the other relevant strategies on integrity.
12. Proposal for action: The SEANL should define an action plan with clear roles and responsibilities among public entities to implement its policies.
Operationalising monitoring and evaluation
13. Proposal for action: In formulating the methodology for monitoring Nuevo León’s integrity policies, the SEANL should carefully define goals, objectives, and indicators.
14. Proposal for action: The SEANL should align the design of the integrity policies with the strategic outline for measuring them.
15. Proposal for action: The Nuevo León Council could be charged with evaluating the SEANL’s integrity policies and proposing recommendations for consideration by the SEANL’s Co-ordination Committee.
CHAPTER 3
Reinforcing the normative framework for public ethics and conflicts of interest in Nuevo León
16. Proposal for action: The SEANL Co-ordination Committee should review the Ethics Code, allowing for wide stakeholder participation, with the aim of adopting a single coherent regulation.
17. Proposal for action: Develop ethical reasoning skills of public officials to resolve ethical dilemmas and conflicts of interest by mainstreaming public integrity measures in human resources management.
18. Proposal for action: Link the values and principles contained in the reviewed Ethics Code with appropriate sanctions.
19. Proposal for action: Conduct surveys among public servants to ensure the implementation of the integrity framework and to identify what kind of scenarios and ethical dilemmas recur.
20. Proposal for action: Identify areas of highest risk in the Government of the State of Nuevo León.
21. Proposal for action: Encouraging each ministry to develop organisational codes, bearing in mind the specific context, kinds of work and the typical ethical dilemmas and specific conflicts of interest situations they tend to face.
22. Proposal for action: Creating a mechanism for publicly disclosing the disciplinary regime, to lend credibility to the whole integrity system, facilitate continuous learning by public officials and prevent corrupt behaviour or breaches of integrity.
23. Proposal for action: Analyse trends in the number of administrative sanctions imposed and criminal prosecutions launched, to identify any challenges and problems in implementing the integrity policy.
Ensuring the appropriate use of tax, assets and interests declarations as mechanisms to reinforce the effective implementation of integrity policies by:
24. Proposal for action: Create a comprehensive, dynamic, updated and harmonised information management system for public servants’ declarations (tax, assets and interests declarations).
25. Proposal for action: Reduce the scope of the obligation to submit asset declarations, based on a risk-based approach, making sure that those in positions most at risk comply on time with this obligation.
26. Proposal for action: Make available and grant access to information submitted by senior officials in their asset declarations, in accordance with access to information regulations.
27. Proposal for action: The management of assets declarations and the two additional declarations should be the responsibility of the proposed Ethics Unit. This would require that the Organic Law of the Public Administration be amended to reassign this task from the Legal Directorate to the new unit.
28. Proposal for action: In the medium term, additional staff should be assigned to the Ethics Unit to manage the integrity framework, monitor public officials’ wealth and identify irregularities in the acquisition or divestment of assets or existing conflicts of interest.
29. Proposal for action: Redesign the communication strategy for integrity policies, particularly in relation to the obligations on tax, asset and interest declarations, to ensure that officials are aware of their obligations and understand that asset and interest declarations are tools to prevent and properly manage conflicts of interest situations when they arise.
30. Proposal for action: Designing a verification and audit strategy with different checks on asset and interest declarations.
31. Proposal for action: Adopt a risk-based strategy with the support of the Ministry for Public Administration, to identify high-risk issues, such as gifts and post-public employment
Adopting awareness-raising initiatives in Nuevo León for a culture of integrity in the public administration, to promote a change in behaviour
32. Proposal for action: Evaluate Nuevo León’s current raising awareness strategy on integrity, to identify weaknesses and opportunities in its three stages.
33. Proposal for action: Redesign Nuevo León’s awareness-raising strategy on integrity with the information obtained in the evaluation.
34. Proposal for action: Include ethical or moral reminders to reduce corrupt behaviour in the work environment, especially when public officials are part of a decision-making process.
35. Proposal for action: Develop a set of indicators to monitor the awareness-raising initiatives, adapting them to new challenges and redefining the objectives where necessary.
36. Proposal for action: Make sure that awareness-raising campaigns reach all public organisations and municipalities, with the participation and co-ordination of the proposed Ethics Unit, the integrity contact points, the Ministry of Public Administration (SFP) and the Executive Agency for the Co-ordination of the State’s Public Administration.
37. Proposal for action: Organise and test projects based on insights from the behavioural sciences, to observe integrity dynamics in selected entities. The aim should be to better understand how the group reacts to undesirable ethical behaviour and to highlight ethical success stories.
Building capacity to promote integrity in public sector entities and organisations:
38. Proposal for action: Propose the adoption of a new, coherent and integrated Public Service Law in Nuevo León.
39. Proposal for action: Introduce additional integrity filters in recruitment policies and procedures, including an ethics component in the assessment of candidates, linking competencies with the strategic priorities of public sector organisations and with ethical behaviour.
40. Proposal for action: Conduct training for senior officials and middle managers on risk management, to give them the tools to identify potential risks of corruption or integrity breaches in their work environment and organisations.
41. Proposal for action: Develop a performance evaluation programme for middle-management and senior officials, by establishing objective ethics indicators. This programme should also link the assessment to a government entity’s mission and organisational objectives, to assess whether conflicts of interest and ethical dilemmas are properly managed.
CHAPTER 4
Creating an open organisational culture
42. Proposal for action: Nuevo León should define clear channels for public officials to ask advice and receive guidance when they are confronted with integrity-related doubts and dilemmas.
43. Proposal for action: Senior officials in Nuevo León should be assigned specific responsibilities to demonstrate ethical leadership and commitment.
44. Proposal for action: The contribution of senior management toward creating an open organisational culture should be considered in their performance evaluation.
Strengthening the whistle-blowing framework
45. Proposal for action: Nuevo León could ensure that the application of the whistle-blowing framework applies beyond the executive branch and that the definition of protected disclosure is clarified.
Providing the right incentives to stimulate whistle-blowing activity
46. Proposal for action: Nuevo León should ensure the availability of internal and external channels to disclose episodes of corruption.
47. Proposal for action: The existing arrangements to ensure confidentiality and security of whistle-blowing information could be reinforced.
48. Proposal for action: Current protection programmes and financial rewards provide valid incentives for whistle-blowers to report, but these could be complemented by labour protection and compensation schemes, and with non-monetary forms of compensation.
Ensuring effective protection
49. Proposal for action: Nuevo León should ensure that retaliatory actions against whistle-blowers constitute a criminal offence.
50. Proposal for action: Nuevo León could further define and clarify the process for seeking protection against acts of reprisal.
51. Proposal for action: To ensure comprehensive management of whistle-blowing protection, the Anti-corruption Unit and Specialised Anti-corruption Unit of the General Attorney Office (Subprocuraduría Especializada en Combate a la Corrupción) should sign an agreement to institutionalise co-ordination processes and best practices.
Increasing awareness and communication
52. Proposal for action: Nuevo León should scale up efforts to improve public awareness of whistle-blowing mechanisms.
53. Proposal for action: Nuevo León could show further leadership in whistle-blowing protection by improving its existing data collection.
CHAPTER 5
Promoting a shared sense of responsibility for integrity in the whole-of-society
54. Proposal for action: Develop awareness-raising activities for citizens and firms on their roles and responsibilities for respecting public integrity.
55. Proposal for action: Develop integrity and anti-corruption training programmes for the business sector and civil society.
56. Proposal for action: Identify areas where an effective intervention in the choice architecture may be feasible.
Training future generations to behave with integrity and prevent corruption
57. Proposal for action: Draw up an action plan to scale up existing legality, public integrity and anti-corruption education materials and incorporate them in the core curriculum.
58. Proposal for action: Design and deliver training about public integrity and anti-corruption for teachers.
CHAPTER 6
A control environment with clear objectives
59. Proposal for action: Nuevo León should ensure that its control environment and organisational structure support its internal control and risk management framework.
60. Proposal for action: Nuevo León could arrange for all staff to receive training on the internal control and risk management framework, to ensure it is implemented consistently.
61. Proposal for action: Nuevo León could apply the principles of the “three lines of defence” model, to give greater responsibility for internal control and risk management to operational management.
A strategic approach to risk management
62. Proposal for action: Nuevo León could introduce a strategic risk management framework to strengthen the internal control framework and improve management of the risk of fraud and corruption.
63. Proposal for action: Nuevo León could operationalise the risk management framework by assigning clear responsibility for managing risk to senior managers, providing training for staff and updating risk management systems and tools.
Coherent control mechanisms
64. Proposal for actions: Nuevo León could:
-
strengthen and integrate its internal control activities to ensure that reasonable assurance is provided.
-
ensure that each internal control serves a purpose and that the overall system is monitored, ethical and efficient.
65. Proposal for action: Nuevo León could consider making better use of its internal control reporting function for identifying issues and risks and reporting on them to management.
An effective and separate internal audit function
66. Proposal for action: Nuevo León could consider investing in training, tools and methodologies for internal audit staff to improve the quality and efficiency of audits.
67. Proposal for action: Nuevo León could ensure that its central co-ordination of internal audit leverages available resources to enhance oversight and allow for a coherent response to integrity risks.
68. Proposal for action: Nuevo León could build on its internal control training programme to provide further training on ethics and integrity for internal auditors.
69. Proposal for action: Nuevo León could strengthen mechanisms for monitoring the implementation of audit recommendations.
70. Proposal for action: Nuevo León could strengthen the independence of its internal audit function by ensuring that it is separate from entity management functions—including the implementation of internal controls and risk management.