4. A practitioner’s toolbox for action to advance industrial transition
This toolbox is designed for policy practitioners and decision makers working to advance industrial transition. It draws on the experiences of the regions and countries that developed High Impact Actions (HIAs) to explore specific experimental governance and policy mechanisms that could facilitate meeting industrial transition aims. It is composed of two elements. The first is a toolkit of policy levers for industrial transition that refines and adds to the toolkit developed in 2019. The second offers an action checklist for policy makers wishing to pursue an experimental approach to designing and implementing policies and programmes targeting industrial transition.
In 2019, the OECD developed a toolkit of policy responses to industrial transition as part of its work with eight European Union (EU) regions and two EU countries, which was integrated into the OECD report Regions in Industrial Transition: Policies for People and Places (2019[1]). The toolkit focused on policy issues and policy responses relevant to industrial transition in five areas: i) preparing for the future of work; ii) broadening and diffusing innovation; iii) promoting entrepreneurship and private sector engagement; iv) transiting towards a climate-neutral economy; and v) promoting inclusive growth.
This 2023 toolbox is divided into two basic tools. The first is an updated version of the 2019 policy lever toolkit, incorporating the new analytical components and policy levers explored through the High Impact Actions (HIAs) analysed in Chapter 3 of this report. It is structured along the five dimensions of industrial transition noted above and incorporates four new ones: framework conditions, strategic planning, stakeholder engagement and smart specialisation. The second part is a checklist for policy makers who wish to apply an experimental approach to policies or initiatives targeting industrial transition.
The toolkit below combines the policy levers for supporting industrial transition revealed in the first phase of the European Commission-OECD Pilot Action on Regions in Industrial Transition and published in 2019, with the tools identified through this new (2022-23) phase of work.
It is organised around the nine dimensions explored in Chapter 4 of this report (Figure 4.1). The first three – all governance dimensions – are presented here for the first time. The subsequent six begin with new levers highlighted through this project and are followed by those that were identified in 2019, plus smart specialisation which was added in 2023.
The toolkit is by no means exhaustive and what is suggested must be considered within – and adapted to – the context of the individual region or country, its industrial transition objectives, challenges and implementation capacities.
The intention is for policy makers to use what is presented here as a guide or repository of helpful ideas, once they have established a clear set of objectives for industrial transition.
Policy experimentation refers to a process in which innovative policies or programmes are tested on a small scale before potentially being implemented on a larger scale. It involves a learning-by-doing approach that allows policy makers to understand the effectiveness of proposed policies and to adjust them if necessary (Centre for Public Impact, 2018[2]).
The following checklist is intended to serve as a guide for policy makers thinking about an experimental approach to support industrial transition. The checklist should be considered as a tool to identify what elements should be in place to increase the probability for an experimental initiative to successfully advance industrial transition goals. In particular, policy makers and practitioners in regions (or countries) in industrial transition can use the checklist to self-assess their policy experimentation readiness. The checklist should not be considered exhaustive and users are welcome to add additional ideas relevant to their needs and context.
The checklist is inspired by the insights gathered from the regions and countries participating in the European Commission-OECD pilot project. It is designed to lead policy makers through a set of steps:
Each step has a series of associated statements or questions a policy maker can ask themselves to consider when thinking about an experimental approach. To help guide the process, there is a checklist at the end of each row where the policy maker can indicate whether the response to the question is “yes” or “no”. There is also a place for comments/notes should the policy maker decide to provide more information about the status of a particular activity, identify targets, timing, stakeholders, partners, etc.
Once complete, the checklist could guide the policy maker in the development of an action plan for applying an experimental approach to initiatives that can help advance a region’s industrial transition.
STEP 1: Situation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Step 1.A. Developing a comprehensive picture of the history, current and potential future development of the region’s dominant industrial sectors | |||
Please indicate if the following statements apply. | Yes | No | Comments/notes |
A thorough quantitative and qualitative assessment has been carried out of where the region’s productive strengths are and where they could be optimised. | |||
A horizon scanning exercise has been carried out to identify other potential/future areas of opportunity or growth based on existing productivity or industrial profile. | |||
Step 1.B. Identifying the industrial transition characteristics of the region | |||
Please identify the characteristics that apply. | Yes | No | Comments/notes |
A lower-than-average per capita gross domestic product (GDP) as a percentage of the national average. | |||
An average annual GDP growth of 1% or less. | |||
A lower than national (or EU) average level of population with tertiary education. | |||
A rising unemployment rate. | |||
A lower than national average life expectancy. | |||
Performance in the middle to bottom half of OECD Regional Well-being indicators (e.g. jobs, income, environment, community, life satisfaction, housing, health, education). | |||
Step 1.C. Identifying the industrial transition dimensions that the experiment should or could support | |||
Please select all dimensions that apply. Add dimensions, if applicable. | Yes | No | Comments/notes |
Innovation and innovation diffusion. | |||
Building skills and jobs of the future. | |||
Supporting SMEs and entrepreneurs. | |||
Just transition to carbon neutrality. | |||
Inclusive growth. | |||
Smart specialisation. | |||
Other, namely: … | |||
Step 1.D. Framework conditions: Identifying if there is a culture of continuous learning and improvement | |||
Please indicate if the following statements apply. | Yes | No | Comments/notes |
Risk taking is supported. | |||
Policy makers are open to working in uncertainty. | |||
Policy makers have room to fail (failure is viewed as a learning opportunity). | |||
Learning is valued. | |||
Policy makers have flexible mindset. | |||
Step 1.E. Framework conditions: Identifying if risk can be mitigated | |||
Please indicate if the following statements apply. | Yes | No | Comments/notes |
There is a political climate or political appetite for experimentation. | |||
A broad base of internal stakeholders is engaged. | |||
A cost/benefit analysis of the experiment is complete. | |||
Other risk-mitigating factors, namely: … | |||
Step 1.F. Identifying potential legislative or regulatory obstacles | |||
Please indicate if the following statements apply. | Yes | No | Comments/notes |
Rules regarding funding and financing programmes or projects are considered to be obstacles. | |||
High levels of red tape/administrative burden. | |||
STEP 2: Planning the experiment | |||
Step 2.A. Setting the experiment’s objectives and priorities | |||
Please answer the following questions. | Yes | No | Comments/notes |
Has the experiment’s purpose been clearly established and communicated to relevant stakeholders? | |||
Have realistic but ambitious objectives been set for the experiment? | |||
Are the objectives clearly relevant and realistic for addressing industrial transition challenges? | |||
Have complementarities in the experiment’s objectives been identified with other strategic documents, sectoral objectives or programmes? | |||
Have relevant internal (government) and external stakeholders been engaged in identifying the objectives? | |||
Is there a clear prioritisation and sequencing of objectives and actions? | |||
Step 2.B. Designing the experiment | |||
Please answer the following questions. | Yes | No | Comments/notes |
Has the experiment been designed with stakeholder input? | |||
Is the experiment designed with room for adjustment if circumstances change (e.g. a need to change the specific project or project target)? | |||
Are there existing channels for knowledge sharing and learning by the project team and among stakeholders? | |||
If there are no existing channels for knowledge sharing and learning, can these be established? | |||
Can the experiment can be scaled up if successful and appropriate (i.e. costs, resource requirements and impact at a larger scale are part of the experiment’s design or considered in a mid-term evaluation process)? | |||
Is scaling out possible if the experiment is successful (i.e. costs, resource requirements and impact in other sectors are part of the experiment’s design or considered in a mid-term evaluation process)? | |||
Step 2.C. Identifying the resources required | |||
Please answer the following questions. | Yes | No | Comments/notes |
Can a team dedicated to managing, co-ordinating and delivering the experiment be established? | |||
Is there access to the human resource skills/expertise necessary to carry out the experiment (e.g. project management, thematic expertise, working with stakeholders, etc.) | |||
Is there sufficient funding to carry out the experiment for its full lifecycle? | |||
Has consideration been given to how to fund a scaled-up or scaled-out version of the experiment if appropriate? | |||
STEP 3: Implementing the experiment | |||
Step 3.A. Identifying institutional capacity to implement the experiment | |||
Please indicate if the following statements apply. | Yes | No | Comments/notes |
The implementing body has the credibility and mandate to manage and co-ordinate the experiment through its lifespan. | |||
The implementing body has the institutional capacity to partner with other government actors and with non-government stakeholders. | |||
There is institutional capacity to launch and maintain active dialogue with stakeholders and use the feedback in a constructive manner. | |||
The experiment has a clearly defined and communicated governance structure. | |||
The roles and responsibilities of actors can be clearly attributed. | |||
Mechanisms to co-ordinate different actors and stakeholders involved in the experiment are in place or can be developed and made operational. | |||
STEP 4: Engaging with stakeholders | |||
Step 4.A. Identify the integration of stakeholder engagement throughout the experiment’s lifecycle | |||
Please indicate if the following statements apply. | Yes | No | Comments/notes |
Potential stakeholders are mapped (e.g. firms, local government, academia, civil society, citizens). | |||
Stakeholders are/will be involved in designing the experiment. | |||
The proposed experiment holds stakeholder appeal. | |||
Stakeholders are actively informed of the experiment in a two-way consultation. | |||
Targeted stakeholders have the capacity and willingness to engage with the experiment. | |||
Stakeholder feedback is actively sought on different aspects of the experiment throughout its lifecycle. | |||
Communication strategies are in place or will be developed to share the results and insights of the experiment with all relevant stakeholders. | |||
STEP 5: Monitoring, evaluating and learning | |||
Step 5.A. Identifying the monitoring and evaluation framework established for the experiment | |||
Please answer the following questions. | Yes | No | Comments/notes |
Has a clear timeframe for the experiment been established and communicated to relevant stakeholders? | |||
Have realistic and measurable ex post evaluation criteria been established to identify if the experiment can/should be scaled up or scaled out? | |||
Will an independent ex post evaluation be undertaken at the end of the experiment’s pre-established timeline? | |||
Has a monitoring and evaluation framework been developed to measure the experiment’s outputs and outcomes? | |||
Have realistic targets and measurable indicators been developed and agreed upon with stakeholders? | |||
Are necessary qualitative or quantitative data accessible? | |||
Is there an accessible channel to clearly communicate results to stakeholders and citizens in an easy-to-understand manner for transparency, accountability and reporting? | |||
Will the lessons and insights from the experiment be captured to improve the experiment and/or to develop future experiments and industrial transition initiatives? |
References
[2] Centre for Public Impact (2018), A Brief Introduction to... Policy Experimentation, https://www.centreforpublicimpact.org/assets/documents/CPI-A-brief-intoduction-to-Policy-experimentation.pdf.
[1] OECD (2019), Regions in Industrial Transition: Policies for People and Places, OECD Regional Development Studies, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/c76ec2a1-en.
Open DOIReferences[1] OECD (2019), Regions in Industrial Transition: Policies for People and Places, OECD Regional Development Studies, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/c76ec2a1-en.
Open DOIReferences[2] Centre for Public Impact (2018), A Brief Introduction to... Policy Experimentation, https://www.centreforpublicimpact.org/assets/documents/CPI-A-brief-intoduction-to-Policy-experimentation.pdf.
Open URL
This document, as well as any data and map included herein, are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. Extracts from publications may be subject to additional disclaimers, which are set out in the complete version of the publication, available at the link provided.
© OECD 2023
The use of this work, whether digital or print, is governed by the Terms and Conditions to be found at https://www.oecd.org/termsandconditions.