Annex B. Econometric analyses
In order to test the relationship between trust in public institutions, its main drivers and the impact of other contextual variables, the study carried out an analysis based on linear regressions. In all regressions, independent variables are normalised, meaning that the coefficients reported represent the change in the dependent variable as a result of one standard deviation increase in the explanatory variable. Results from linear regressions are presented for trust in government, the local government and the civil service.
The policy and contextual drivers of trust in government, the local government and the civil service are presented respectively in Tables B.1, B.2 and B.3. The three instances are regressed using the three broad categories presented in the conceptual framework: a) interpersonal drivers; b) policy drivers (i.e. competences and values) and c) sustainability and perception of government actions in key societal trends. Each of the individual categories is first regressed on the dependent variable, first including the full set of variables, and in the following using a selection determined by a stepwise regression. In the final columns, all three categories are grouped together, and the significant variables are retained (using the same methodology). The full models, marked in bold, have the higher explanatory power and are those retained for subsequent policy analysis based (See Chapters 2-4).
Table A B.1. Trust in government | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Interpersonal drivers | Policy drivers (competence and values) | Sustainability and key societal trends | Full model | |||||
VARIABLES | All | Selection | All | Selection | All | Selection | All | Selection |
Interpersonal trust | 0.741*** | 0.749*** | 0.364*** | 0.371*** | ||||
-0.0705 | -0.0697 | -0.0662 | -0.064 | |||||
Gender | 0.459*** | 0.470*** | 0.265** | 0.357*** | ||||
-0.122 | -0.119 | -0.109 | -0.103 | |||||
Education | 0.0514 | 0.0500* | ||||||
-0.0335 | -0.0303 | |||||||
Migration background | 0.906*** | 0.486* | ||||||
-0.321 | -0.287 | |||||||
Age | -0.0268 | -0.106* | ||||||
-0.0634 | -0.056 | |||||||
Employment status (employed) | -0.326** | -0.241* | ||||||
-0.141 | -0.126 | |||||||
Income | 0.127* | 0.0796 | ||||||
-0.0711 | -0.0631 | |||||||
Geographical location (urban) | 0.138 | 0.151 | ||||||
-0.156 | -0.138 | |||||||
Political efficacy (having a say) | 0.815*** | 0.825*** | 0.240*** | 0.234*** | ||||
-0.0787 | -0.0654 | -0.0838 | -0.0656 | |||||
Political efficacy (ability to participate in politics) | -0.132 | -0.091 | ||||||
-0.0872 | -0.074 | |||||||
Participated at recent meeting party, union, etc | 0.187 | -0.164 | ||||||
-0.281 | -0.264 | |||||||
Signed a petition (including online) | 0.379*** | 0.431*** | 0.151 | |||||
-0.131 | -0.13 | -0.113 | ||||||
Interest in politics | 0.0729 | 0.0499 | ||||||
-0.0887 | -0.0751 | |||||||
Political orientation (right) | -0.328*** | -0.315*** | -0.283*** | -0.328*** | ||||
-0.0649 | -0.0654 | -0.0559 | -0.0541 | |||||
Service adaptation (responsiveness) | 0.524*** | 0.630*** | 0.450*** | 0.509*** | ||||
-0.0855 | -0.0768 | -0.0834 | -0.0791 | |||||
Innovation service provision (responsiveness) | 0.121 | 0.0103 | ||||||
-0.0904 | -0.0826 | |||||||
Preparedness public institutions to fight spread of new disease (reliability) | 0.352*** | 0.365*** | 0.207** | |||||
-0.0868 | -0.0785 | -0.0861 | ||||||
Stability regulatory conditions (reliability) | 0.349*** | 0.356*** | 0.298*** | 0.357*** | ||||
-0.0831 | -0.0804 | -0.0771 | -0.0725 | |||||
Revolving door (integrity) | 0.129* | 0.0708 | ||||||
-0.067 | -0.0622 | |||||||
High level officials refusing bribes (integrity) | 0.213*** | 0.258*** | 0.130* | 0.178*** | ||||
-0.0768 | -0.0677 | -0.0711 | -0.0642 | |||||
Voicing concerns (openness) | 0.147 | 0.0045 | ||||||
-0.0898 | -0.0859 | |||||||
Availability of information (openness) | -0.0326 | -0.146** | ||||||
-0.0759 | -0.0732 | |||||||
Equality of treatment socioeconomic characteristics (fairness) | -0.171** | -0.0997 | ||||||
-0.0697 | -0.0705 | |||||||
Equality sharing burden reforms (fairness) | 0.272*** | 0.298*** | 0.11 | |||||
-0.0848 | -0.0822 | -0.0785 | ||||||
Public institutions doing enough to address the sustainability of the environment | -0.430*** | -0.426*** | -0.172** | |||||
-0.0792 | -0.079 | -0.0705 | ||||||
Public institutions doing enough to ensure social cohesion | 0.461*** | 0.505*** | 0.107 | |||||
-0.107 | -0.0967 | -0.0964 | ||||||
Public institutions doing enough to address future challenges (reliability) | 1.030*** | 1.055*** | 0.511*** | 0.474*** | ||||
-0.0959 | -0.0957 | -0.0882 | -0.0709 | |||||
Public institutions doing enough to ensure equal opportunities in life | 0.102 | -0.0988 | ||||||
-0.0848 | -0.0827 | |||||||
Constant | 4.533*** | 5.181*** | 6.576*** | 6.578*** | 6.571*** | 6.571*** | 5.966*** | 6.049*** |
-0.631 | -0.314 | -0.0529 | -0.0533 | -0.0581 | -0.0581 | -0.571 | -0.162 | |
Observations | 926 | 926 | 971 | 971 | 979 | 979 | 891 | 891 |
R-squared | 0.385 | 0.368 | 0.474 | 0.462 | 0.35 | 0.349 | 0.563 | 0.538 |
Robust standard errors in parentheses | ||||||||
*** p<0.01, ** p<0.05, * p<0.1 |
Table A B.2. Trust in local government | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interpersonal drivers | Policy drivers (competences and values) | Sustainability and key societal trends | Full model | ||||
VARIABLES | All | Selection | All | Selection | All | Selection | All | Selection |
Interpersonal trust | 0.674*** | 0.684*** |
|
|
|
| 0.340*** | 0.324*** |
| -0.0663 | -0.0663 |
|
|
|
| -0.0652 | -0.0641 |
Gender | 0.128 |
|
|
|
|
| 0.0268 |
|
| -0.112 |
|
|
|
|
| -0.105 |
|
Education | 0.00346 |
|
|
|
|
| -0.00158 |
|
| -0.0324 |
|
|
|
|
| -0.0294 |
|
Migration background | 0.994*** | 1.083*** |
|
|
|
| 0.489** |
|
| -0.28 | -0.286 |
|
|
|
| -0.239 |
|
Age | -0.123** |
|
|
|
|
| -0.190*** |
|
| -0.0595 |
|
|
|
|
| -0.0537 |
|
Employment status (employed) | -0.237* |
|
|
|
|
| -0.229* |
|
| -0.13 |
|
|
|
|
| -0.12 |
|
Income | 0.0641 |
|
|
|
|
| 0.0357 |
|
| -0.0654 |
|
|
|
|
| -0.0599 |
|
Geographical location (urban) | -0.0423 |
|
|
|
|
| -0.106 |
|
| -0.152 |
|
|
|
|
| -0.141 |
|
Political efficacy (having a say) | 0.657*** | 0.619*** |
|
|
|
| 0.0955 |
|
| -0.0664 | -0.0572 |
|
|
|
| -0.0747 |
|
Political efficacy (ability to participate in politics) | -0.206*** |
|
|
|
|
| -0.192*** |
|
| -0.0752 |
|
|
|
|
| -0.0691 |
|
Participated at recent meeting party, union, etc | 0.255 |
|
|
|
|
| 0.027 |
|
| -0.251 |
|
|
|
|
| -0.258 |
|
Signed a petition (including online) | 0.303*** |
|
|
|
|
| 0.0601 |
|
| -0.116 |
|
|
|
|
| -0.104 |
|
Interest in politics | 0.182** |
|
|
|
|
| 0.181*** | 0.195*** |
| -0.0707 |
|
|
|
|
| -0.0611 | -0.059 |
Political orientation (right) | 0.0326 |
|
|
|
|
| 0.0259 |
|
| -0.055 |
|
|
|
|
| -0.0518 |
|
Service adaptation (responsiveness) |
|
| 0.286*** | 0.319*** |
|
| 0.213*** | 0.278*** |
|
|
| -0.0776 | -0.0772 |
|
| -0.0767 | -0.0781 |
Innovation service provision (responsiveness) |
|
| 0.240*** | 0.255*** |
|
| 0.182** | 0.231*** |
|
|
| -0.0777 | -0.0775 |
|
| -0.0773 | -0.0798 |
Preparedness public institutions to fight spread of new disease (reliability) |
|
| 0.253*** | 0.306*** |
|
| 0.176** | 0.216*** |
|
|
| -0.0774 | -0.0722 |
|
| -0.0797 | -0.0748 |
Stability regulatory conditions (reliability) |
|
| 0.164** |
|
|
| 0.126* |
|
|
|
| -0.0739 |
|
|
| -0.0755 |
|
Revolving door (integrity) |
|
| 0.114* |
|
|
| 0.136** | 0.202*** |
|
|
| -0.0643 |
|
|
| -0.064 | -0.0537 |
High level officials refusing bribes (integrity) |
|
| 0.156** | 0.229*** |
|
| 0.063 |
|
|
|
| -0.0714 | -0.061 |
|
| -0.0715 |
|
Voicing concerns (openness) |
|
| 0.294*** | 0.354*** |
|
| 0.233*** | 0.283*** |
|
|
| -0.0777 | -0.0733 |
|
| -0.0816 | -0.0706 |
Availability of information (openness) |
|
| 0.105 |
|
|
| -0.0189 |
|
|
|
| -0.0723 |
|
|
| -0.075 |
|
Equality of treatment socioeconomic characteristics (fairness) |
|
| -0.0185 |
|
|
| -0.0532 |
|
|
|
| -0.0652 |
|
|
| -0.0697 |
|
Equality sharing burden reforms (fairness) |
|
| 0.165** | 0.216*** |
|
| 0.0861 |
|
|
|
| -0.072 | -0.0736 |
|
| -0.0745 |
|
Public institutions doing enough to address the sustainability of the environment |
|
|
|
| -0.0772 |
| 0.0526 |
|
|
|
|
|
| -0.0695 |
| -0.0643 |
|
Public institutions doing enough to ensure social cohesion |
|
|
|
| 0.413*** | 0.381*** | 0.197** | 0.297*** |
|
|
|
|
| -0.0983 | -0.0989 | -0.0856 | -0.0669 |
Public institutions doing enough to address future challenges (reliability) |
|
|
|
| 0.603*** | 0.590*** | 0.132 |
|
|
|
|
|
| -0.086 | -0.0848 | -0.0802 |
|
Public institutions doing enough to ensure equal opportunities in life |
|
|
|
| 0.243*** | 0.239*** | -0.0968 |
|
|
|
|
|
| -0.0819 | -0.0818 | -0.0856 |
|
Constant | 5.011*** | 6.224*** | 6.252*** | 6.253*** | 6.262*** | 6.261*** | 6.114*** | 6.265*** |
| -0.556 | -0.0535 | -0.0466 | -0.0471 | -0.0522 | -0.0522 | -0.567 | -0.0464 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Observations | 922 | 922 | 969 | 969 | 976 | 976 | 889 | 889 |
R-squared | 0.345 | 0.324 | 0.467 | 0.458 | 0.325 | 0.324 | 0.507 | 0.49 |
Table A B.3. Trust in the Civil Service | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interpersonal drivers | Policy drivers (competence and values) | Sustainability key social trends | Full model | ||||
VARIABLES | All | Selection | All | Selection | All | Selection | All | Selection |
Interpersonal trust | 0.699*** | 0.728*** |
|
|
|
| 0.341*** | 0.360*** |
| -0.0688 | -0.0665 |
|
|
|
| -0.0645 | -0.0615 |
Gender | 0.214** |
|
|
|
|
| 0.109 |
|
| -0.105 |
|
|
|
|
| -0.0954 |
|
Education | 0.0403 |
|
|
|
|
| 0.0287 |
|
| -0.0272 |
|
|
|
|
| -0.0249 |
|
Migration background | 0.854*** | 0.853*** |
|
|
|
| 0.279 |
|
| -0.287 | -0.278 |
|
|
|
| -0.248 |
|
Age | -0.00804 |
|
|
|
|
| -0.0371 |
|
| -0.055 |
|
|
|
|
| -0.0495 |
|
Employment status (employed) | -0.0593 |
|
|
|
|
| 0.0347 |
|
| -0.128 |
|
|
|
|
| -0.113 |
|
Income | 0.142** | 0.136*** |
|
|
|
| 0.0843 | 0.0921** |
| -0.0647 | -0.0483 |
|
|
|
| -0.0584 | -0.0426 |
Geographical location (urban) | 0.054 |
|
|
|
|
| 0.0555 |
|
| -0.132 |
|
|
|
|
| -0.123 |
|
Political efficacy (having a say) | 0.612*** | 0.613*** |
|
|
|
| 0.0295 |
|
| -0.0691 | -0.0571 |
|
|
|
| -0.0709 |
|
Political efficacy (ability to participate in politics) | -0.105 |
|
|
|
|
| -0.0696 |
|
| -0.0841 |
|
|
|
|
| -0.0719 |
|
Participated at recent meeting party, union, etc | 0.0771 |
|
|
|
|
| -0.224 |
|
| -0.232 |
|
|
|
|
| -0.223 |
|
Signed a petition (including online) | 0.291** |
|
|
|
|
| 0.0822 |
|
| -0.116 |
|
|
|
|
| -0.101 |
|
Interest in politics | 0.157** |
|
|
|
|
| 0.11 |
|
| -0.0759 |
|
|
|
|
| -0.0674 |
|
Political orientation (right) | 0.019 |
|
|
|
|
| -0.0103 |
|
| -0.0549 |
|
|
|
|
| -0.0501 |
|
Service adaptation (responsiveness) |
|
| 0.399*** | 0.503*** |
|
| 0.362*** | 0.405*** |
|
|
| -0.0802 | -0.0748 |
|
| -0.0773 | -0.0781 |
Innovation service provision (responsiveness) |
|
| 0.172** |
|
|
| 0.105 | 0.163** |
|
|
| -0.0799 |
|
|
| -0.08 | -0.0719 |
Preparedness public institutions to fight spread of new disease (reliability) |
|
| 0.250*** | 0.293*** |
|
| 0.137* |
|
|
|
| -0.0776 | -0.0733 |
|
| -0.0798 |
|
Stability regulatory conditions (reliability) |
|
| 0.194*** | 0.215*** |
|
| 0.11 | 0.172*** |
|
|
| -0.0726 | -0.072 |
|
| -0.0711 | -0.0654 |
Revolving door (integrity) |
|
| 0.0217 |
|
|
| 0.0331 |
|
|
|
| -0.0607 |
|
|
| -0.0575 |
|
High level officials refusing bribes (integrity) |
|
| 0.260*** | 0.273*** |
|
| 0.151** | 0.196*** |
|
|
| -0.0681 | -0.0599 |
|
| -0.0639 | -0.0575 |
Voicing concerns (openness) |
|
| 0.104 |
|
|
| 0.0455 |
|
|
|
| -0.0752 |
|
|
| -0.078 |
|
Availability of information (openness) |
|
| 0.217*** | 0.270*** |
|
| 0.1 | 0.140** |
|
|
| -0.0702 | -0.0674 |
|
| -0.0696 | -0.0654 |
Equality of treatment socioeconomic characteristics (fairness) |
|
| 0.0196 |
|
|
| -0.0561 |
|
|
|
| -0.0614 |
|
|
| -0.0633 |
|
Equality sharing burden reforms (fairness) |
|
| 0.161** | 0.203*** |
|
| 0.0503 |
|
|
|
| -0.0686 | -0.0665 |
|
| -0.0734 |
|
Public institutions doing enough to address the sustainability of the environment |
|
|
|
| -0.175*** | -0.175*** | -0.0845 |
|
|
|
|
|
| -0.0663 | -0.0663 | -0.0658 |
|
Public institutions doing enough to ensure social cohesion |
|
|
|
| 0.406*** | 0.406*** | 0.163* | 0.154** |
|
|
|
|
| -0.0939 | -0.0939 | -0.0854 | -0.0775 |
Public institutions doing enough to address future challenges (reliability) |
|
|
|
| 0.605*** | 0.605*** | 0.233*** | 0.270*** |
|
|
|
|
| -0.0866 | -0.0866 | -0.08 | -0.0753 |
Public institutions doing enough to ensure equal opportunities in life |
|
|
|
| 0.376*** | 0.376*** | 0.0869 |
|
|
|
|
|
| -0.0731 | -0.0731 | -0.0764 |
|
Constant | 5.443*** | 6.531*** | 6.887*** | 6.886*** | 6.889*** | 6.889*** | 6.680*** | 6.680*** |
| -0.525 | -0.137 | -0.0445 | -0.0447 | -0.0495 | -0.0495 | -0.489 | -0.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Observations | 918 | 918 | 964 | 964 | 971 | 971 | 884 | 884 |
R-squared | 0.376 | 0.361 | 0.497 | 0.49 | 0.371 | 0.371 | 0.548 | 0.533 |
This document, as well as any data and map included herein, are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. Extracts from publications may be subject to additional disclaimers, which are set out in the complete version of the publication, available at the link provided.
© OECD 2021
The use of this work, whether digital or print, is governed by the Terms and Conditions to be found at http://www.oecd.org/termsandconditions.