Annex C. Examples of other relevant evaluation studies not included in the report
Country | Topic | Year of the Report | Source of Evidence |
---|---|---|---|
Belgium | Export promotion scheme | 2017 | Academic article: (Broocks and Van Biesebroeck, 2017[54]). The impact of export promotion on export market entry. Journal of International Economics, 107, 19-33. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2017.03.009 |
Czech Republic | Business training | 2019 | Academic article: (Pelucha, Kveton and Potluka, 2019[55]). Using mixed method approach in measuring effects of training in firms: Case study of the European Social Fund support. Evaluation and program planning, 73, 146-155. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.12.008 |
Czech Republic | Investment subsidies | 2019 | Academic article: (Dvouletý and Blažková, 2019[56]). The Impact of Public Grants on Firm-Level Productivity: Findings from the Czech Food Industry. Sustainability, 11(2), 552. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020552 |
Czech Republic | Business incubators, support of innovative ventures | 2018 | Academic article: (Dvouletý et al., 2018[57]). Are publicly funded Czech incubators effective? The comparison of performance of supported and non-supported firms. European Journal of Innovation Management, 21(4), 543-563. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-02-2018-0043 |
Finland | Innovation grants, R&D grants | 2014 | Academic article: (Einiö, 2014[58]). R&D subsidies and company performance: Evidence from geographic variation in government funding based on the ERDF population-density rule. Review of Economics and Statistics, 96(4), 710-728. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00410 |
Finland | Investment subsidies | 2013 | Academic article: (Koski and Pajarinen, 2013[59]). The role of business subsidies in job creation of start-ups, gazelles and incumbents. Small Business Economics, 41(1), 195-214. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-012-9420-5 |
Germany | Finance, start-up subsidy | 2016 | Academic article: (Caliendo, Künn and Weißenberger, 2016[60]). Personality traits and the evaluation of start-up subsidies. European Economic Review, 86, 87-108. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2015.11.008 |
Germany | Finance, start-up subsidy | 2018 | Academic article: (Bellmann, Caliendo and Tübbicke, 2018[61]). The Post-Reform Effectiveness of the New German Start-Up Subsidy for the Unemployed. Labour, 32(3), 293-319. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/labr.12126 |
Germany | Finance, start-up subsidy | 2019 | Working paper: (Caliendo, Künn and Weissenberger, 2020[62]). Catching up or Lagging Behind?. IZA Discussion Papers, No. 12690. Available at: https://doi.org/10.25932/publishup-43701 |
Germany | Regional development programme, investment subsidies | 2019 | Academic article: (Brachert, Dettmann and Titze, 2019[63]). The regional effects of a place-based policy–Causal evidence from Germany. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 79, 103483. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2019.103483 |
Chile | Finance, investment tax credit | 2010 | Master thesis (academic): (Marshall, 2010[64]). Is the Tax Credit for SME in Chile an Effective Policy to Boost Investment? (No. 46). Center for International Development at Harvard University. Available at: https://ideas.repec.org/p/cid/wpfacu/46.html |
Chile | Soft business support, counselling, advisory services | 2019 | Working paper: (Johan and Valenzuela, 2021[65]). Business Advisory Services and Female Employment in an Extreme Institutional Context. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3484474 |
Italy | Regional development programme, investment subsidies | 2017 | Academic article: (Pellegrini and Muccigrosso, 2017[66]). Do subsidized new firms survive longer? Evidence from a counterfactual approach. Regional Studies, 51(10), 1483-1493. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1190814 |
Italy | Business incubators, support of innovative ventures | 2019 | Academic article: (Lukeš, Longo and Zouhar, 2019[67]). Do business incubators really enhance entrepreneurial growth? Evidence from a large sample of innovative Italian start-ups. Technovation, 82, 25-34. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2018.07.008 |
Italy | Export promotion scheme | 2020 | Academic article: (Comi and Resmini, 2020[68]). Are export promotion programs effective in promoting the internalization of SMEs?. Economia Politica Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40888-019-00170-8 |
Korea | Innovation grants, R&D grants | 2015 | Academic article: (Kim, Oh and Lee, 2015[69]). Economic Impact Assessment of Public–Private Matching Fund Programs Using Firm-Level Data. The Singapore Economic Review, 60(04), 1550060. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217590815500605 |
Latvia | Investment subsidies | 2018 | Working paper: (Beņkovskis, Tkačevs and Yashiro, 2019[70]). Importance of EU Regional Support Programmes for Firm Performance. (No. 2017/8). Latvijas Banka Working Paper (No. 1/2018). Available at: https://www.macroeconomics.lv/sites/default/files/2018-02/wp_1_2018_en.pdf |
Portugal | Innovation grants, R&D grants | 2019 | Academic article: (Santos et al., 2019[71]). Which projects are selected for an innovation subsidy? The Portuguese case. Portuguese Economic Journal, (forthcoming). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10258-019-00159-y |
Slovakia | Innovation grants, R&D grants | 2019 | Academic article: (Nemethova, Siranova and Sipikal, 2019[72]). Public support for firms in lagging regions—evaluation of innovation subsidy in Slovakia. Science and Public Policy, 46(2), 173-183. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scy046 |
Slovenia | Investment subsidies, anti-crisis subsidies | 2012 | Working paper: (Schweiger, 2012[73]). The impact of state aid for restructuring on the allocation of resources. European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. Available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.233.2068&rep=rep1&type=pdf |
Spain | Finance, credit guarantee scheme | 2021 | Academic article: (Martín-García and Morán Santor, 2021[74]). Public guarantees: a countercyclical instrument for SME growth. Evidence from the Spanish Region of Madrid. Small Business Economics, (forthcoming). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00214-0 |
United Kingdom | Finance, credit guarantee scheme | 2018 | Academic article: (Cowling, Ughetto and Lee, 2018[75]). The innovation debt penalty: Cost of debt, loan default, and the effects of a public loan guarantee on high-tech firms. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 127, 166-176. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.06.016 |
United States | Enterprise zones | 2019 | Academic article: (Zhang, 2019[76]). Rethinking US enterprise zones: The role of research design in program evaluation. Local Economy, (forthcoming). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0269094219871955 |
United States | Soft business support, counselling, advisory services | 2019 | Academic article published in conference proceedings: (Buffart et al., 2019[77]). Picking the Right Winners: Government Business Support Programs and Entrepreneurial Growth. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 2019, No. 1, p. 10868). Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management. Available at: https://journals.aom.org/doi/abs/10.5465/AMBPP.2019.10868abstract |
United States | Business incubators, support of innovative ventures | 2013 | Academic article: (Amezcua et al., 2013[78]). Organizational sponsorship and founding environments: a contingency view on the survival of business-incubated firms, 1994–2007. Academy of Management Journal, 56(6), 1628-1654. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0652 |
Open DOIReferences[55] Pelucha, M., V. Kveton and O. Potluka (2019), “Using mixed method approach in measuring effects of training in firms: Case study of the European Social Fund support”, Evaluation and Program Planning, Vol. 73, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.12.008.
Open DOIReferences[56] Dvouletý, O. and I. Blažková (2019), “The impact of public grants on firm-level productivity: Findings from the Czech food industry”, Sustainability (Switzerland), Vol. 11/2, https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020552.
Open DOIReferences[57] Dvouletý, O. et al. (2018), “Are publicly funded Czech incubators effective? The comparison of performance of supported and non-supported firms”, European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 21/4, https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-02-2018-0043.
Open DOIReferences[58] Einiö, E. (2014), “R&D subsidies and company performance: Evidence from geographic variation in government funding based on the ERDF population-density rule”, Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 96/4, https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00410.
Open DOIReferences[59] Koski, H. and M. Pajarinen (2013), “The role of business subsidies in job creation of start-ups, gazelles and incumbents”, Small Business Economics, Vol. 41/1, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-012-9420-5.
Open DOIReferences[60] Caliendo, M., S. Künn and M. Weißenberger (2016), “Personality traits and the evaluation of start-up subsidies”, European Economic Review, Vol. 86, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2015.11.008.
Open DOIReferences[61] Bellmann, L., M. Caliendo and S. Tübbicke (2018), “The Post-Reform Effectiveness of the New German Start-Up Subsidy for the Unemployed”, Labour, Vol. 32/3, https://doi.org/10.1111/labr.12126.
Open DOIReferences[62] Caliendo, M., S. Künn and M. Weissenberger (2020), “Catching up or lagging behind? The long-term business and innovation potential of subsidized start-ups out of unemployment”, Research Policy, Vol. 49/10, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104053.
Open DOIReferences[63] Brachert, M., E. Dettmann and M. Titze (2019), “The regional effects of a place-based policy – Causal evidence from Germany”, Regional Science and Urban Economics, Vol. 79, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2019.103483.
Open DOIReferences[64] Marshall, C. (2010), “Is the Tax Credit for SME in Chile an Effective Policy to Boost Investment”, CID Research Fellow and Graduate Student Working Paper Series. References[65] Johan, S. and P. Valenzuela (2021), “Business Advisory Services and Female Employment in an Extreme Institutional Context”, British Journal of Management, Vol. 32/4, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12429.
Open DOIReferences[66] Pellegrini, G. and T. Muccigrosso (2017), “Do subsidized new firms survive longer? Evidence from a counterfactual approach”, Regional Studies, Vol. 51/10, https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1190814.
Open DOIReferences[67] Lukeš, M., M. Longo and J. Zouhar (2019), “Do business incubators really enhance entrepreneurial growth? Evidence from a large sample of innovative Italian start-ups”, Technovation, Vol. 82-83, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2018.07.008.
Open DOIReferences[68] Comi, S. and L. Resmini (2020), “Are export promotion programs effective in promoting the internalization of SMEs?”, Economia Politica, Vol. 37/2, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40888-019-00170-8.
Open DOIReferences[69] Kim, Y., I. Oh and J. Lee (2015), “Economic impact assessment of public-private matching fund programs using firm-level data”, Singapore Economic Review, Vol. 60/4, https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217590815500605.
Open DOIReferences[70] Beņkovskis, K., O. Tkačevs and N. Yashiro (2019), “Importance of EU regional support programmes for firm performance”, Economic Policy, Vol. 34/98, https://doi.org/10.1093/epolic/eiz003.
Open DOIReferences[71] Santos, A. et al. (2019), “Which projects are selected for an innovation subsidy? The Portuguese case”, Portuguese Economic Journal, Vol. 18/3, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10258-019-00159-y.
Open DOIReferences[72] Nemethova, V., M. Siranova and M. Sipikal (2019), “Public support for firms in lagging regions-evaluation of innovation subsidy in Slovakia”, Science and Public Policy, Vol. 46/2, https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scy046.
Open DOIReferences[73] Schweiger, H. (2012), “The Impact of State Aid for Restructuring on the Allocation of Resources”, SSRN Electronic Journal, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2180457.
Open DOIReferences[74] Martín-García, R. and J. Morán Santor (2021), “Public guarantees: a countercyclical instrument for SME growth. Evidence from the Spanish Region of Madrid”, Small Business Economics, Vol. 56/1, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00214-0.
Open DOIReferences[75] Cowling, M., E. Ughetto and N. Lee (2018), “The innovation debt penalty: Cost of debt, loan default, and the effects of a public loan guarantee on high-tech firms”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 127, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.06.016.
Open DOIReferences[76] Zhang, S. (2019), “Rethinking U.S. enterprise zones: The role of research design in program evaluation”, Local Economy, Vol. 34/6, https://doi.org/10.1177/0269094219871955.
Open DOIReferences[77] Buffart, M. et al. (2019), “Picking the Right Winners: Government Business Support Programs and Entrepreneurial Growth”, Academy of Management Proceedings, Vol. 2019/1, https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2019.10868abstract.
Open DOIReferences[78] Amezcua, A. et al. (2013), “Organizational sponsorship and founding environments: A contingency view on the survival of business-incubated firms, 1994-2007”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 56/6, https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0652.
Open DOI
This document, as well as any data and map included herein, are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. Extracts from publications may be subject to additional disclaimers, which are set out in the complete version of the publication, available at the link provided.
© OECD 2023
The use of this work, whether digital or print, is governed by the Terms and Conditions to be found at https://www.oecd.org/termsandconditions.