3. Innovating apprenticeships in Scotland

The importance of innovation and technology in the apprenticeship system

When it comes to apprenticeships, technology can play an important role in reducing the transaction costs of matching apprentices and employers, facilitating teaching and learning, and enabling better communication among relevant stakeholders. More broadly, innovation and technology can help to increase the number of apprenticeships; improve the quality of teaching, training and learning; and enable closer monitoring of the system. The COVID-19 pandemic has shown the benefits of using innovative technology for teaching and learning, especially in the context of school closures (OECD, 2020[1]; OECD, 2021[2]), but also highlighted the challenges faced by the vocational education and training (VET) sector where practice-oriented learning in workplaces, workshops and simulated work environments is the norm.

Technologies such as online learning, virtual/augmented/mixed reality and simulators, all provide opportunities to make training more accessible, flexible, safe, and efficient (Box 3.1 gives an overview of the different types of technology that could be used in vocational education). The use of technology in apprenticeships is expanding in several countries, including in Scotland, complementing or (partially) replacing more traditional forms of delivery and assessment along the apprenticeship journey. Nonetheless, there are opportunities for Scotland to accelerate the adoption of technology in education and apprenticeships. For example, although some Scottish learning providers benefit from well-established information and communications technology (ICT) infrastructure and systems for remote learning delivery, not all of them had invested sufficiently in their ICT infrastructure prior to the pandemic. Many colleges reported a range of issues in relation to connectivity, particularly in rural areas (Education Scotland, 2021[3]). In addition, the pandemic also highlighted the complexities of supplementing or replacing work-based learning opportunities.

To overcome barriers like these, strategic guidance and practical support for the effective use of technology will be crucial, as well as the involvement of both the private and public sector – employers, training providers, colleges, universities, research institutions and government. Those who provide teaching and training in classrooms and workplaces should play a role in ensuring that low-quality digital learning tools do not displace valuable instructional activities that could be better done without digital devices (OECD, 2021[4]). Drawing on international examples, this chapter focuses on how Scotland could use technology to expand and strengthen its apprenticeship system.

Aligning apprenticeship provision to labour market needs is one of the most difficult but important tasks in an agile apprenticeship system. Technology can help by providing relevant and timely data, including big data about labour market needs and data analytics (ETF, 2020[6]). Such datasets provide many opportunities and are increasingly being used, but also need to be used with caution (Box 3.2). Combining big data with complementary sources of skills intelligence will be key to generating statistically robust, detailed and policy-relevant evidence (Cedefop; European Commission; ETF; ILO; OECD; UNESCO, 2021[7]).

Scotland is doing well in assessing and anticipating skills needs. For example, Skills Development Scotland (SDS) systemically produces sectoral and regional skills assessments, focusing on employment, vacancies and new job openings. SDS already combines evidence from multiple qualitative and quantitative sources with real-time data to offer estimates of current and future skills needs. They are used to inform apprenticeship offers and other skill matters (SDS, 2021[8]).

However, stakeholder discussion in preparation for this OECD review highlighted that employers in Scotland still feel that there is a need to identify and address local and regional skills shortages in a more agile and responsive manner. Data on the match between the apprenticeships on offer and labour market demand are limited. It would be necessary to gather evidence to show whether apprenticeship starts are well aligned with the needs of the labour market (see also Chapter 2) and whether employers make forward-looking skills investments. For example, data on how well apprenticeship starts reflect current labour market needs such as in fast-growing sectors and occupations or strategic priorities for the future – ideally disaggregated by level of skills, sector and other targeted characteristics – could be useful for designing and guiding apprenticeship provision.

More could also be done to help employers and learning providers to access and understand the results of skills intelligence and to effectively use them for their skills planning and training provision – both in the short and long term. Skills intelligence could benefit not just those working on curriculum design and delivery, but also those working in areas such as career guidance and counselling, budget allocations for training programmes, human resources, and migrant workers. Scotland is currently building “skills and technology route maps” to help stakeholders use skills intelligence at the skills planning stage.

Technology cannot only be used to reduce mismatch between the apprenticeship offer and labour market needs overall, but also to better match learners, learning providers and employers. Technology can help connect them, by profiling individuals’ skills and aspirations, employers’ skills needs, and learning providers’ training offers, and finding the best matches between them. This can help reduce searching and matching costs and increase the effectiveness of matching skill needs and training.

Scotland has set up a comprehensive online apprenticeship portal called apprenticeships.scot. Among its many functions, the portal offers services to connect apprentices and employers, and provides information on apprenticeship jobs and funding opportunities, and general guidance and advice on apprenticeships. Although the majority of apprentices are not recruited via this portal – in practice many apprentices have been working for their employer for some months or years before they start their apprenticeship – hard-to-fill vacancies such as in the childcare sector are regularly advertised through it. In order to make this function more effective, the platform could use profiling technology. For example, data analytics and statistical profiling could help to target, identify and reach out to potential apprentices and employers. Statistical models can help governments identify target groups based on their policy goals as well as economic needs. Scotland already has various databases, including the records in SDS’s Customer Support System, which could be further exploited to that end.

Public employment services in various countries profile individuals and match them to services or interventions based on factors commonly associated with long-term unemployment and at-risk groups. Rather than relying on traditional one-to-one matching, more innovative profiling models are likely to become more prominent as big data become more widely available. Combined with new machine learning techniques, the models can use the data to improve their predictive power and target results more precisely, ideally in conjunction with a continuous dialogue between data analysts, policy makers and practitioners (Landeghem, Desiere and Struyven, 2021[9]). With more detailed data collection on students, apprentices and graduates, as well as learning providers and employers, profiling models could be used to identify individuals who could benefit from an apprenticeship, including early school leavers and job seekers. Flanders (Belgium) provides a useful example of a deep learning model using real-time labour market data and job seekers’ skills data to support people in taking up vocational training or finding jobs (Box 3.3). Likewise, on the employer side, data on employees’ skills and employers’ training systems can show which enterprises could benefit from offering apprenticeships and/or need support to engage in apprenticeship provision. Box 3.4 describes Germany’s self-assessment tool for companies to use to identify how far they have progressed towards Industry 4.0, as well as to analyse their employees’ skills, their own efforts to develop skills and their training practices.

These identification and matching tools could be combined with existing tools for raising awareness about and the attractiveness of apprenticeships and should not replace more traditional efforts to promote and strengthen the image of apprenticeships.

The COVID-19 pandemic provided an impetus for innovation by forcing education and training providers to use technology to ensure continuity of learning during school closures, including in vocational education. Many countries have increased the share of online vocational education programmes (Briggs, López and Anderson, 2021[12]). The pandemic gave many workers and students a chance to work and study remotely – as work goes virtual, so too must apprenticeships. Learners in Scotland have since highlighted how much they appreciate, and have benefited from, increased and flexible online access to support functions. However, the pandemic also highlighted some challenges, including around digital skills and connectivity issues – which are not specific to apprenticeships but could have an impact given the increasing use of online courses relevant to apprenticeships. According to Education Scotland (2021[3]), a number of colleges in Scotland identified digital skills gaps among individual learners and staff, as well as issues with access to digital equipment and connectivity. In most colleges, learning resources and activities were also made available as physical resource packs, delivered directly to learners, to support those facing barriers to accessing remote learning such as poor connectivity or digital poverty (Education Scotland, 2021[3]).

The benefits of more and better technology use in education go beyond the pandemic, and this is also the case for apprenticeships. Technology can help increase the accessibility of apprenticeships (Box 3.5). Online and virtual learning can improve access for learners in remote areas by providing remote connections to learning providers and employers – as long as Internet connectivity is up to standard. For example, the Open University in Scotland offers flexible distance-learning opportunities, including Graduate Apprenticeships in software development and cyber security. It reaches out to employee-apprentices working in remote areas such as the Shetland Islands, far off the northern Scottish coast. Another example is e-Sgoil, a Scottish initiative that promotes online learning to improve equity and access across the Western Isles, supporting Foundation Apprenticeships (e-Sgoil, 2021[13]). In Norway, apprentices in rural settings have successfully completed certain programme requirements through e-learning platforms (OECD/ILO, 2017[14]). Other types of technology can also make apprenticeships more accessible to students with disabilities that may have prevented them from following certain pathways in the past. For example, AI systems can help students overcome obstacles, such as through text-to-speech or speech-to-text applications or wearables to help visually impaired students read books (Vincent-Lancrin and van der Vlies, 2020[15]).

More advanced technology can help to diversify training options, by overcoming material shortages that might otherwise limit what governments and learning providers can offer to students and how students can progress. For example, virtual or augmented reality (VR/AR) and simulators, can enable students to develop vocational skills by performing specific tasks like operating heavy machinery, learning how to repair a car engine, or testing chemical products in a laboratory (OECD, 2021[4]). In such cases, it may be cheaper and safer to use simulators or VR/AR than traditional laboratories that are expensive to set up, maintain and update.

Technology can also increase the effectiveness of learning in terms of learning progress and outcomes. According to a World Bank study, VR training is more effective on average than traditional training in developing technical, practical and socio-emotional skills; it is particularly promising in fields of health and safety, engineering and technical education. Students who had VR training used inputs and time more efficiently and/or were better at avoiding performance errors than students receiving traditional training. For each additional hour of VR training, students scored 3% higher in technical learning assessments than those exposed to the same content delivered through traditional methods (Angel-Urdinola, Castillo-Castro and Hoyos, 2021[16]).

Another potential benefit of technology is that it can be used to provide personalised support to learners and teachers. Learner tracking systems, where teachers and trainers have detailed information on learners, can improve the quality of training provision, similar to the player-level analytics available to a professional sports coaching staff. Such systems can provide teachers and trainers with information that they may have neglected during lessons due to their workload or other systemic, technical, or institutional issues. Data analytics and statistical profiling models can be also used to identify students at risk of dropping out, using the administrative micro-data that are increasingly being collected by education systems and organisations. While identifying a good set of early warning indicators remains difficult, a few systems have shown a high level of accuracy and enriched thinking about the reasons students drop out (OECD, 2021[4]). These techniques may help prevent students dropping out, detect potential problems, and provide opportunities to intervene earlier. For example, in the United Kingdom, predictive analytics tools can be used to identify high-risk programmes and learners by measuring trends in learner engagement and motivation (Box 3.5).

Finally, technology can also be used to reduce administrative and repetitive tasks involved in apprenticeship management, such as managing admissions and school allocations, assessment reports, proctoring systems, and resource allocation and planning (OECD, 2021[4]). The Scottish apprenticeship system is already making use of such technologies to some extent.

While there are many potential benefits to the use of technology, it also poses challenges and traditional face-to-face learning will in certain cases remain the preferred option. Increasing the use of technology should be a means to an end and not an end in itself. Hence, technology and innovation should be carefully embedded into curricula and pedagogy with the aim of achieving a higher level of performance. Any new approach by training employers and providers should be supported by research and development, and supplemented by learner performance analytics on progression. Although World Bank research (Angel-Urdinola, Castillo-Castro and Hoyos, 2021[16]) found that VR training can be as effective as traditional training methods, its effectiveness differs across sectors and subjects.

The use of technology and innovation for apprenticeship teaching and training is growing in Scotland but more could be done to fully take advantage of the benefits described above. The Enterprise and Skills Strategic Board sub-group recommended supporting the expanded use of technology in apprenticeships, at least for off-the-job training, within the context of the COVID-19 pandemic (ESSB, 2020[25]). A key first step would be to assess the status of technology use in Scottish apprenticeships and identify which parts of the system could make more and better use of it. For example, the Netherlands undertook a survey to identify how different technologies are used for different training objectives as well as the barriers to the use of innovative technology in apprenticeships (Box 3.6)

The European Commission’s SELFIE (Self-reflection on Effective Learning by Fostering the Use of Innovative Educational Technologies)1 is a free online tool designed to help education and learning providers in Europe and beyond embed digital technology into teaching, learning and assessment. SELFIE anonymously gathers the views of students, teachers, in-company trainers and school leaders on how technology is used in their school. Their input can be used by schools to formulate an action plan and set priorities to implement changes to support teaching, learning and student assessment (Hippe, Brolpito and Broek, 2021[28]).

The results from such an assessment can be used to develop an innovation plan for the apprenticeship system. Implementing innovation requires strong leadership within training institutions, well-trained vocational teachers and trainers, strong co-ordination with employers and technology-solution developers, and of course adequate financial resources (OECD, 2021[5]). The example of the Netherlands (Box 3.6) shows that technology use in apprenticeships depends on the capacity of employers and training providers to put it to effective use. Ultimately, the use of technology in apprenticeships is only possible if training employers and providers are both interested and have the capacity, resources and tools to implement the innovation (see Section 2.3).

Vocational teachers and in-company trainers play a role in finding the right balance between in-person teaching and remote, online, or other use of technology (OECD, 2021[4]). They need to carefully balance the pros and cons of technology use and its effectiveness, but also the costs and benefits of using technology versus traditional methods. Training providers and employer may require additional support to be able to make informed decisions.

The extent to which teachers and in-company trainers will effectively integrate new technology into their activities depends strongly on their digital and pedagogical skills. However, the evidence from OECD countries is that a significant share of VET teachers do not use digital technologies for teaching or do not feel confident in doing so. Around one in four VET teachers using the SELFIE tool in OECD countries do not feel confident using digital technologies in classroom teaching, or when providing feedback to their students. Confidence using technology is lower among older VET teachers: around 82% of VET teachers aged 30 to 39 feel confident preparing lessons using digital technology, and 76% of them feel confident using technology in class teaching, but those figures fall to 59% and 53%, respectively, for teachers over 60 (OECD, 2021[5]). Likewise, younger vocational teachers are more likely to use digital resources than their older peers (Figure 3.2). For instance, almost 70% of teachers under the age of 30 use digital technology as part of their teaching to engage their students or to foster their creativity, compared with only slightly more than 50% of those over 60 (OECD, 2021[5]).

Teachers and trainers in apprenticeship programmes can make more effective use of innovative technologies in the delivery of apprenticeships if they have the interest and capacity to do so and the right resources and tools. Therefore, teachers and trainers should be supported, and able to participate in professional development in this area (e.g., data and teacher tracking system can offer teacher feedback for self-regulation). It is important to ensure that older teachers and trainers do not get left behind in this transition.

Recommendations and implementation for Using innovation and technology to further expand and promote apprenticeships

Assessment in apprenticeships – and in technical education and training more broadly – can be complex for learning providers, employers and assessors, especially when it involves authentic work tasks, synoptic assessment and grading (Field, 2021[29]). Technology can provide more time- and cost-effective ways of assessing practical skills, and can help streamline the process.

Similarly, technology can improve the monitoring of quality and outcomes in the apprenticeship system, by providing more accurate, timely and detailed information on the labour market outcomes of apprentices. Monitoring can be more rigorously and effectively conducted using advanced analytical approaches and technologies that facilitate data collection and analysis. This information can help to make the apprenticeship system more responsive (Chapter 2) and inclusive (Chapter 4).

Assessment in apprenticeships in OECD countries often involves evaluation of both theoretical knowledge and practical and technical skills. Assessment of practice-oriented and employability skills in an authentic working environment is often not straightforward, due in part to material and equipment costs (Kis and Windisch, 2018[30]). In addition, certification and qualification processes may involve collecting many pieces of evidence about the competences achieved, which can be administratively burdensome and complex as standards and frameworks evolve. This is particularly the case when different stakeholders are involved in assessing and providing evidence at different phases of an apprenticeship.

Technology can create innovative, cost-effective and predictable ways to assess practical skills and collect the necessary evidence. Digital and smart technology is increasingly being used in the assessment of education and training outcomes, including in apprenticeships, and in compiling e-portfolios of skills. For example:

  • Multi-functional e-platforms that facilitate apprenticeship processes including assessment and certification, can reduce administration and communication costs and facilitate communication and data collection, as in the case of Norway (Box 3.7). Mobile logbooks allow apprentices to record and demonstrate their learning and training progress, including details such as hours worked, tasks performed and equipment used. Likewise, (self-) assessment platforms can be used to assess and broaden apprentices’ competences and prepare them for summative assessments or examinations (ILO, 2020[23]). As hinted in Box 3.5, apprenticeship providers in Scotland also use e-portfolios or equivalent online platforms to undertake these tasks.

  • Online exam tools or online assessment platforms can reduce the work of assessors by creating exam questions to test competence-oriented tasks and compile them into an overall exam. Germany is developing a prototype for such a tool (Winther, 2021[31]) (Box 3.7).

  • Smart technologies and smart data analysis techniques enable assessments to be broadened to take in skills that cannot be easily measured by conventional tests. For example, game-based tests can measure higher-order skills (e.g. creativity) or emotional and behavioural skills (e.g. collaboration, behavioural strategy), and analyse eye-tracking data and audio recordings, and process natural language and information such as time-on-task (OECD, 2021[4]). In Scotland, the Thales group already uses online game-based assessment when recruiting apprentices.

  • Blockchain technology can open new avenues for credentialing in apprenticeships as a form of “verification infrastructure”. It enables claims about an individual or institution, including their characteristics and qualifications, to be verified instantly and with a very high level of certainty. This helps eliminate diploma and other record fraud; facilitates the movement of learners and workers between training institutions, workplaces and jurisdictions; and empowers individuals by giving them increased control over their own data. Many blockchain initiatives are underway across the world, which may transform how apprenticeship systems – as well as entire skills systems – manage degrees and qualifications (OECD, 2021[4]). Several European countries are advancing in this area, including Scotland (see Box 3.5). Micro-credentials such as digital badges are becoming increasingly common. Several sector bodies in Scotland offer modularised training courses and micro-credentials to certify professional skills acquired in those courses (e.g. Scottish Social Services Council), which may be suitable for integration into apprenticeship courses, assessments and certification. There is also work being undertaken by QAA Scotland via a sector-wide project entitled “Understanding Micro-credentials and Small Qualifications in Scotland” to explore and understand the potential of micro credentials and digital badging (QAA Scotland, 2021[32]).

Despite its potential, the use of technology for assessments is relatively uncommon compared to aspects of apprenticeships. For example, only 56% of VET teachers using the SELFIE tool in OECD countries use digital technologies for assessment purposes (Figure 3.2) (OECD, 2021[5]). Evidence is scarce in Scotland, but while online assessment has already been used sporadically, there is room to explore more advanced uses of technology-enabled assessment and certification. For example, the Federation for Industry Sector Skills and Standards (FISS) in the United Kingdom manages an apprenticeship certification system to reduce the cost and bureaucracy associated with certification. This kind of process could be integrated with an apprenticeship management system to better link the learning process and outcome assessment. Caution is needed when expanding these kinds of innovative approaches. For example, it is important to be transparent about how accurate technological systems are at measuring, diagnosing or assessing and to consider data protection requirements. At the same time, the limits of technologies should be fairly measured against the limits of human beings performing similar tasks.

Close collaboration between employers, trainers and assessors – as well as strategic support from government – is a fundamental step prior to making any decision about implement technology solutions for assessment.

Scotland has made a significant progress in using data to monitor both the education and labour market outcomes of apprentices, and costs and benefits to employers. The Education and Skills Impact Framework (ESIF) initiative was implemented in 2019, building on SDS’s Apprenticeship Long Term Outcome (ALTO) Framework, which followed the 2016 OECD recommendations for apprenticeship evaluation (Bajgar and Criscuolo, 2016[37]). ESIF will provide estimates of the economic and social impact of investment in post-school education and skills for individuals, employers and the public purse (Box 3.8).

Prior to the initiative, Scotland published the Modern Apprenticeships (MA) Outcomes Reports (2012, 2016) based on telephone surveys of apprentices, which asked about outcomes such as skills, career progression and employment, and the MA Employer Survey 2015. These self-report studies can be unreliable measures of impact because respondents might have consciously or unconsciously adjusted their answers to what they expected the evaluator hoped to hear, and also because it is difficult for respondents to judge what the outcome would have been without participation (Bajgar and Criscuolo, 2016[37]) . In addition, the surveys contacted apprentices within six months of completing their training and so did not provide information on longer-term outcomes. The OECD recommendations advised that these surveys should instead provide information on the operation, costs and form of training provided (Box 3.8). More recent surveys, including the Apprenticeship Employer Survey (SDS, 2020[38]) and Modern Apprentice in Training (SDS, 2019[39]) are moving in this direction and continue to provide useful information.

The new ESIF evaluation results, which are based on administrative data linkages, are expected to provide additional and more robust insight than self-reported impacts, with a focus on longer term outcomes (up to seven years after completion of the apprenticeship). Scotland’s next step should be to use these results to refine its apprenticeship instruments and continue to update the studies as new cohorts of apprenticeship data and other linked administrative data become available.

The ESIF also includes a cost-benefit analysis which could be used to benchmark against other countries. For example, in Germany, BIBB conducts a representative survey on the costs and benefits of apprenticeships every five years. The latest survey found that on average the net cost to companies was EUR 6 478 per apprentice for the 2017/18 training year (totalling EUR 8.4 billion), without considering savings from recruitment costs and other long-term benefits. Around 28% of trainees generate net income for employers during their training period while the remaining trainees were only worthwhile to employers in the medium or long term. Switzerland also produces cost-benefit analysis at the economy, programme and firm level, using intensive data inputs and monitoring mechanisms (SERI, 2020[40]). Korea also occasionally monitors the cost-benefit of apprenticeships, with the most recent results showing that the net present value for Korean society was estimated at approximately USD 2.3 billion for the period of 2016-20 (KRIVET, 2019[41]). Such analyses can help engage employers and learners in the apprenticeship system.

Recommendations and implementation for innovating assessment and monitoring of performance and outcomes

Scotland has developed several strategies that could foster the digitalisation of the apprenticeship system, and the Scottish economy more broadly. These include the Education and Skills Review (including on innovation) (Scottish Government, 2017[43]), Digital Strategy and Roadmap for Innovations in Industry, and Scotland’s Artificial Intelligence Strategy (Digital Scotland, 2021[44]). Scotland is committed to promoting innovation across sectors, and this is expected to have a spillover effect on apprenticeships. In addition, Scotland’s dual goal of economic growth and net zero emissions, gives it an interest in maximising the use of digital technology and ecological solutions at every corner.

Ensuring that the Scottish apprenticeship system is fully geared towards these economy-wide goals will require strategic guidance and practical support on applying its innovation strategies to the apprenticeship system. Guidelines and support for the actual implementation at the institutional level can will help actors in the apprenticeship system to adopt and effectively use rapidly advancing technology.

Given the opportunities that newly available technologies offer for innovation, learning providers and employers should be given guidance and assistance as well as incentives to integrate them into their training. This requires systemic efforts, including equipping learning providers with new devices and software, and teaching teachers and trainers how to use them in their practice, as well as substantial investment and prioritisation for doing so. OECD countries generally have a high level of access to devices, but practical support and guidance from educational institutions or national-level bodies is often missing.

Data from the SELFIE tool (discussed above) show that vocational teachers do not always get the support they need for using digital technologies in the classroom (Hippe, Pokropek and Costa, 2021[45]) (also see the Netherlands example in Box 3.6). For example, across OECD countries with available data, only 52% of vocational teachers using the SELFIE tool reported receiving support from their institutional leaders when trying out new ways of teaching with digital technology, and 45% said that their institutional leaders discuss their professional development needs with them for teaching with digital technology. Only 31% of the teachers agreed that they had time to explore how to improve their teaching with digital technology, and 51% that their institutional leaders support them in sharing experiences within their institution about teaching with digital technology.

A survey of staff in Dutch VET schools (Box 3.6) showed that the most important enabling factors for the successful adoption of digital technology in teaching and learning were having a strategic vision and goals for digital technology adoption (ECBO, 2019[27]). A well-designed strategy for the digital transformation of training institutions, including training companies, starts with an assessment of the current use of technology, the support measures available and any identified challenges. This can be done using a tool like Switzerland’s Digi-Check (Box 3.9). Digital transformation plans and guidance should have concrete goals and targets for the implementation of new technologies. Many VET providers do not carry out systematic reviews of progress on the use of digital technology: only 37% of vocational teachers in OECD countries using the SELFIE tool agreed that progress in teaching and learning with digital technology is reviewed in their school (OECD, 2021[5]).

On-site technical support in the use of technology as well as relevant professional development will also facilitate developing the practice of VET teachers and trainers. In Scotland, apprenticeship providers and SDS (and the SFC with its new responsibilities on Graduate and Foundation Apprenticeships) should ensure that VET teachers and trainers have sufficient time and resources to experiment, reflect, learn and implement new technology in their teaching and training. One way of achieving this could be by encouraging stakeholder partnerships for the development and use of technology and innovation in apprenticeships, as explored below.

Training providers, employers and apprentices can play a key role in ensuring that new technologies are relevant for the apprenticeship system. In recent years, the education technology (EdTech) market has grown, and many EdTech companies have started producing applications tailored to the need of vocational teachers, trainers and learners, including apprenticeship management systems, simulators and VR/AR. VET teachers, trainers and industry experts are often involved in the design of new applications, making a significant contribution towards developing materials that are relevant and easy to use in vocational training (OECD, 2021[5]). Several countries encourage such collaborations by establishing formal partnerships between the VET sector, industry, EdTech companies and research and development institutions to foster innovation and the use of technology in VET (Box 3.10).

Financial resources and guidance are often provided to help support the establishment of these partnerships. Since 2012, the Innovation Centre Programme in Scotland has encouraged researchers and businesses to forge new collaborations across sectors, with some of the initiatives involving vocational training. Box 3.10 also provides international examples of such support initiatives: Germany’s smart learning factories in VET schools, funded by regional governments, and Denmark’s Knowledge Centres in VET funded by the Danish government.

Another example is Scotland’s Digital Skills Partnership (2017-20), funded by SDS and the SFC. The partnership connected industry with colleges and universities, with the goal of addressing the rapidly growing and changing skills needs of the digital economy. The partnership offered a range of events to help college and university lecturers teaching computing skills to connect with industry employers. The partnership also trialled a collaborative software development project which enabled college and university teachers and students to work together on live industry projects in real workplaces, using industry tools.

Building on these positive experiences, Scotland could further encourage EdTech companies to co-create digital tools and materials with vocational teachers, students and employers that are relevant, affordable, scalable, inter-operational and easy to use in apprenticeships. Unless these important stakeholders are part of the design and use of those tools and materials, the technology is unlikely to be effective for learning and training (OECD, 2021[4]).

Recommendations and implementation for providing strategic guidance and practical support for innovation

References

[24] Abrahams, M. (2018), Patron Think Piece - Aptem: Smart machines can transform apprenticeships,, https://www.aelp.org.uk/news/news/think-pieces/patron-think-piece-aptem-smart-machines-can-transform-apprenticeships/.

[22] Advance CTE (2020), CTE Distance Learning in Rural Communities, https://cte.careertech.org/sites/default/files/documents/factsheets/CTE_Distance_Learning_Rural_Fact_Sheet_2020.pdf.

[10] Amazon Web Services (2021), AWS Partner Story: VDAB & Radix.ai, https://aws.amazon.com/partners/success/vdab-radix-ai/.

[16] Angel-Urdinola, D., C. Castillo-Castro and A. Hoyos (2021), Meta-Analysis Assessing the Effects of Virtual Reality Training on Student Learning and Skills Development, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 9587, https://iloskillskspstorage.blob.core.windows.net/development/resources/4923/Meta-Analysis-Assessing-the-Effects-of-Virtual-Reality-Training-on-Student-Learning-and-Skills-Development.pdf.

[42] Bajgar, M. and C. Criscuolo (2018), “Designing Evaluation of Modern Apprenticeships in Scotland”, in Data-Driven Policy Impact Evaluation, Springer International Publishing, Cham, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78461-8_18.

[37] Bajgar, M. and C. Criscuolo (2016), “OECD Evaluation Framework for Modern Apprenticeships in Scotland”, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers, No. 35, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/59084781-en.

[35] BMBF (2021), ASCOT, https://www.ascot-vet.net/ascot/de/ascot-projekte/ascot-projekte_node.html;jsessionid=169A2384E7D2E2A2733580B40B471F25.live092.

[12] Briggs, A., D. López and T. Anderson (2021), Online Career and Technical Education Programs during the Pandemic and After: A Summary of College Survey Findings, Urban Institute, https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/104193/online-career-and-technical-education-programs-during-the-pandemic-and-after_1.pdf.

[17] CAF-FCA (2019), Flexibility and Innovation in Apprenticeship Technical Training - project evaluation report, https://caf-fca.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/CAF-FIATT-Report_EN_F.pdf.

[33] Cedefop (2021), Italy: guidelines for the certification of competences,, http://www.cedefop.europa.eu/en/news-and-press/news/italy-guidelines-certification-competences?src=email&freq=weekly.

[7] Cedefop; European Commission; ETF; ILO; OECD; UNESCO (2021), Perspectives on policy and practice: tapping into the potential of big data for skills policy, Publications Office, Luxembourg, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2801/25160.

[44] Digital Scotland (2021), Scotland’s Artificial Intelligence Strategy Trustworthy, Ethical and Inclusive, https://www.gov.scot/binaries/content/documents/govscot/publications/strategy-plan/2021/03/scotlands-ai-strategy-trustworthy-ethical-inclusive/documen.

[27] ECBO (2019), Onderwijsinnovaties met moderne ICT in het mbo, Expertisecentrum Beroepsonderwijs, https://ecbo.nl/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/Rapport-Onderwijsinnovaties-met-moderne-ICT.pdf (accessed on 13 November 2020).

[3] Education Scotland (2021), Remote learning in Scotland’s Colleges, https://education.gov.scot/media/ddkng0mn/scotlands-colleges-main-report.pdf.

[13] e-Sgoil (2021), E-Sgoil Support for Schools and Teachers, https://www.e-sgoil.com/.

[25] ESSB (2020), Report by the Enterprise & Skills Strategic Board sub-group on Measures to Mitigate the Labour Market Impacts from COVID-19, https://www.gov.scot/publications/report-enterprise-skills-strategic-board-sub-group-measures-mitigate-labour-market-impacts-covid-19/documents/.

[6] ETF (2020), International Trends and Innovation in Career Guidance, https://www.etf.europa.eu/sites/default/files/2020-11/innovation_in_career_guidance_vol._2_0.pdf.

[29] Field, S. (2021), A World Without Maps? Assessment in Technical Education. A Report to the Gatsby Foundation, Gatsby Charitable Foundation, London, https://www.gatsby.org.uk/uploads/education/reports/pdf/assessment-in-technical-education-simon-field.pdf.

[28] Hippe, R., A. Brolpito and S. Broek (2021), “SELFIE for work-based learning”, In preparation.

[45] Hippe, R., A. Pokropek and P. Costa (2021), “Cross-country validation of the SELFIE tool for digital capacity building of Vocational Education and Training schools”, In preparation.

[23] ILO (2020), ILO Toolkit for Quality Apprenticeships. Volume 2 Guide for Practitioners: Innovations and strategies in apprenticeships, https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_emp/---ifp_skills/documents/publication/wcms_751118.pdf.

[34] INAPP (2019), Atlas del lavoro e delle qualificazioni, https://atlantelavoro.inapp.org.

[30] Kis, V. and H. Windisch (2018), “Making skills transparent: Recognising vocational skills acquired through workbased learning”, OECD Education Working Papers, No. 180, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/5830c400-en.

[41] KRIVET (2019), Apprenticeship in Korea, https://www.krivet.re.kr/eng/eu/zc/euZ_prB.jsp?gn=E1%7CE120200898%7C0%7C3.

[9] Landeghem, B., S. Desiere and L. Struyven (2021), Statistical profiling of unemployed jobseekers, IZA World of Labor 2021: 483, https://doi.org/10.15185/izawol.483.

[46] Lernfabrik Bietigheim-Bissingen (2020), Programmiert auf Lernerfolg!, Lernfabrik Bietigheim-Bissingen website, https://www.lernfabrik-bietigheim.de/anlage/ (accessed on 17 November 2020).

[26] Muilenburg, L. and Z. Berge (eds.) (2016), Digital badges in education: Trends, issues, and cases, Routledge.

[4] OECD (2021), OECD Digital Education Outlook 2021: Pushing the Frontiers with Artificial Intelligence, Blockchain and Robots, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/589b283f-en.

[5] OECD (2021), Teachers and Leaders in Vocational Education and Training, OECD Reviews of Vocational Education and Training, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/59d4fbb1-en.

[2] OECD (2021), “Teaching and learning in VET: Providing effective practical training in school-based settings”, OECD Policy Responses to Coronavirus (COVID-19), OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/64f5f843-en.

[11] OECD (2020), “Digital business diagnostic tools for SMEs and entrepreneurship: A review of international policy experiences”, OECD SME and Entrepreneurship Papers, No. 21, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/516bdf9c-en.

[1] OECD (2020), “VET in a time of crisis: Building foundations for resilient vocational education and training systems”, Policy Brief, OECD, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/efff194c-en.

[14] OECD/ILO (2017), Engaging Employers in Apprenticeship Opportunities: Making It Happen Locally, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264266681-en.

[18] OU (2022), New grant to develop blockchain technology for learning, https://www.open.ac.uk/research/news/new-grant-develop-blockchain-technology-learning#:~:text=The%20OU's%20Knowledge%20Media%20Institute,their%20educational%20and%20employment%20qualifications.

[32] QAA Scotland (2021), Exploring the potential of micro-credentials and digital badging, https://www.enhancementthemes.ac.uk/resilient-learning-communities/completed-projects/exploring-the-potential-of-micro-credentials-and-digital-badging.

[43] Scottish Government (2017), Enterprise and Skills Review: Report on Phase 2: Innovation, https://www.gov.scot/binaries/content/documents/govscot/publications/independent-report/2017/06/enterprise-skills-review-report-phase-2-innovation/documents/00521419-pdf/005.

[8] SDS (2021), Sectoral Skills Assessments, https://www.skillsdevelopmentscotland.co.uk/media/47942/ssa-technical-note.pdf.

[38] SDS (2020), Apprenticeship Employer Survey 2020, https://www.stf.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/aes-2020-report-final.pdf.

[19] SDS (2020), Quality Assurance Assessment 2019-20: BAE Systems Ltd, https://www.skillsdevelopmentscotland.co.uk/media/47146/bae-systems-qa-report-may19.pdf.

[20] SDS (2020), Quality Assurance Assessment 2019-20: Ident Training Ltd, https://www.skillsdevelopmentscotland.co.uk/media/47162/ident-training-ltd-qa-report-dec19.pdf.

[39] SDS (2019), Modern Apprentice in Training. Headline Results. September 2019, Skills Development Scotland, https://www.skillsdevelopmentscotland.co.uk/media/45987/ma-in-training-survey-headline-findings-report-september-2019.pdf.

[40] SERI (2020), Kostenerhebung der kantonalen Berufsbildung Rechnungsjahr 2019, https://www.sbfi.admin.ch/sbfi/de/home/bildung/berufsbildungssteuerung-und--politik/berufsbildungsfinanzierung/kostenerhebung-der-kantonalen-berufsbildung.html.

[36] Ștefӑnicӑ, F. et al. (2016), “Modeling, Measurement, and Development of Professional Competence in Industrial-Technical Professions”, in Technical and Vocational Education and Training: Issues, Concerns and Prospects, Competence-based Vocational and Professional Education, Springer International Publishing, Cham, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41713-4_39.

[21] UNESCO (2017), Beyond Access: ICT-enhanced Innovative Pedagogy in TVET in the Asia-Pacific, https://bangkok.unesco.org/sites/default/files/assets/article/ICT%20in%20Education/TVET/TVET%20pub.PDF.

[15] Vincent-Lancrin, S. and R. van der Vlies (2020), “Trustworthy artificial intelligence (AI) in education: Promises and challenges”, OECD Education Working Papers, No. 218, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/a6c90fa9-en.

[31] Winther, E. (2021), ASPE - Digital Workbench for competence-oriented examination tasks and final exams, BMBF, https://www-ascot--vet-net.translate.goog/ascot/de/ascot-projekte/aspe/aspe.html?_x_tr_sl=de&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en-US&_x_tr_pto=nui.

Note

← 1. It was developed based on the European Commission Framework for Digitally-Competent Educational Organisations (DigCompOrg). The tool was developed with a team of experts from schools, education ministries and research institutes across Europe.

Metadata, Legal and Rights

This document, as well as any data and map included herein, are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. Extracts from publications may be subject to additional disclaimers, which are set out in the complete version of the publication, available at the link provided.

© OECD 2022

The use of this work, whether digital or print, is governed by the Terms and Conditions to be found at https://www.oecd.org/termsandconditions.