Annex A. Progress since the 2013 DAC peer review recommendations
Towards a comprehensive development effort
|
2013 Recommendations |
Progress in implementation |
|---|---|
|
Recommendation 1.1 Norway should aim to scale-up partnerships with likeminded donors to help attract more resources and secure long-term sustainability of its global initiatives. |
Partially Implemented |
|
Recommendation 1.2 To improve further co-ordination, monitoring and reporting, Norway should develop a specific time-bound coherence agenda on a select number of key issues of incoherence with cross-governmental objectives and a detailed implementation plan. |
Partially Implemented |
Vision and policies for development co-operation
|
Recommendation 2.1 Setting out expected results and providing guidance on translating policy into operational approaches could help implement policy priorities more effectively. |
Implemented |
|
Recommendation 2.2 Developing a clear and evidence-based strategy to guide its bilateral aid decisions could help Norway bring poverty reduction closer to the operations and avoid getting involved in situations in which it has no clear comparative advantage or understanding of the context, and ensure the sustainability of its development co-operation. |
Implemented |
Aid volume and allocations
|
Recommendation 3.1 Norway would benefit from strategic yearly planning at both central and country levels that builds on ex-ante assessments and analyses of the expected development results. |
Partially Implemented |
|
Recommendation 3.2 Norway should ensure that its need for accountability does not undermine or duplicate the accountability structures of its multilateral partners. It should increasingly rely on, and participate in, joint assessment processes in order to keep transaction costs as low as possible for multilateral partners. |
Partially Implemented |
Organisation and management
|
Recommendation 4.1 Norway should continue to improve the clarity between the respective roles of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Norad. |
Partially Implemented |
|
Recommendation 4.2 To foster Norad’s ability to provide solid country and evidence-based advice to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the embassies, Norad staff should be encouraged to apply, and continue to be considered, for positions abroad in line with the Ministry’s policy on staff rotation. |
Not Implemented |
Development co-operation delivery and partnerships
|
2013 Recommendations |
Progress in implementation |
|---|---|
|
Recommendation 5.1 To make its aid more predictable, Norway should provide more comprehensive medium-term projections to its partner countries. |
Partially Implemented |
|
Recommendation 5.2 When working in fragile contexts, Norway should set out clear whole-of-government priorities that are co-ordinated with other donors, realistic about what can be achieved in a given timeframe, and that account for trade-offs between risks and opportunities, and short and long-term effects. |
Implemented |
|
Recommendation 5.3 Norway should seek to clarify, together with partners, what risk will be tolerated, and how risk will be managed. |
Partially Implemented |
Results and accountability
|
Recommendation 6.1 Norway should further improve its system of learning by implementing a formal management response system including making clear reporting lines and follow-up responsibilities on evaluation recommendations. |
Partially Implemented |
|
Recommendation 6.2 Norway should ensure consistent quality across all evaluations, including decentralised ones, to improve its aid programme’s evidence base. |
Partially implemented |
Humanitarian assistance
|
Recommendation 7.1 Norway should promote greater synergies between humanitarian and development programmes, especially in the areas of crisis prevention and risk reduction. |
Partially Implemented |
|
Recommendation 7.2 Norway should set clear, expected results for its humanitarian funding and humanitarian diplomacy. |
Implemented |
